Filed under: Babies, Children, General, Health, Humanity, Life, News, World | Tags: baby born with two faces, baby Lali, baby with two faces, complete craniofacial duplication, conjoined twinning, cranial facial duplication, craniofacial duplication, diprosopus, Lali Singh, medical anomalies, medical news, monocephalus diprosus, Sabir Ali, Saifi Hospital, Saini, two faced baby, Vinod and Sushma Singh, what is normal
Update: Since the time of the writing of this post, baby Lali has passed away. Special thanks to Ismael for providing this link to verify this fact. Baby Lali may have only lived a short time, but she inspired much needed discussion and thought, and also much love and compassion. May she rest in peace.
No, the image you see to your right isn’t trick photography, nor is it a joke or a prank created with the wonders of Photoshop or Paintshop Pro.
The image you see is that of Lali, a baby recently born to impoverished parents in Saini, 25 miles from New Delhi. She was born with the condition known as craniofacial duplication.
Reading a USA Today article on her birth, this particular portion made a big impact on me:
“A baby with two faces — two noses, two pairs of lips and two pairs of eyes — was born in a northern Indian village, where she is doing well and is being worshipped as the reincarnation of a Hindu goddess. Hundreds of pilgrims have visited Lali, the 1-month-old baby, and her impoverished parents to touch her feet out of respect and receive blessings.”
I couldn’t help but think to myself, how different things would be had she been born here in Canada or the United States. Chances are, the first thought would have been horror, followed by an immediate, “Who and where can we have this surgically corrected?” We who worship celebrity, perfection and a media that insists on impressing upon our own young that if their nose is less than perfect, they must fix it; if their boobs are not big enough they must inflate them… and we who choose to irrationally believe that all the “beautiful people” on magazines are actually that perfect without any help from the re-touch artist, would no doubt be traumatized to have given birth to a child with two sets of eyes, two noses and two pairs of lips.
Wouldn’t we?
Often, the condition of craniofacial duplication means serious health complications, but in Lali’s case, doctors say she is fine and everything is going well. While her parents admit it was hard to accept, they have.
The question then, is should they just love her and leave well enough alone (and possibly continue to allow others to worship her) or should they adopt a western mentality and desire or seek the chance to surgically return her to what we would consider normal?
Post a comment and tell us what you think. At fracas, newcomers are always welcome!
More Information on Craniofacial Duplication:
“Although classically considered conjoined twinning (which it resembles), this anomaly is not normally due to the fusion or incomplete separation of two embryos. Among other things, this governs the width of facial features. In excess it leads to widening of facial features and to duplication of facial structures. The greater the widening, the more of the structures are duplicated, often in a mirror image form. This has been demonstrated in the laboratory by introducing pellets of a protein into chicken embryos, resulting in chickens with duplicate beaks.”
- Definition (cont.)
- Report on Diprosopus: Medical Imaging
- Monocephalus Diprosopus – Complete Craniofacial Duplication (Caution, in this case the baby was aborted and a photo is included. Do not click if this will traumatize you to view.)
[Lali's photo credit and the rest of the USA Today article: Manan Vatsyayana, AFP/Getty Images]
66 Comments










Wow, this really raises some interesting questions. You’re right: we automatically assume the Western attitude that any anomly must be fixed. But maybe we can learn a lesson about what’s considered “normal” in other cultures. I think it’s amazing and beautiful that people are worshipping this precious little baby.
Comment by JD at I Do Things April 8, 2008 @ 6:54 PMTo be worshipped may not be the best thing either for a child who could possibly have other health needs. The benefits of worship could cloud her parent’s judgement about meeting Lali’s needs over their own. Fears of offending religious doctrines could also impede interventions which may have but a small window of opportunity. On the other hand, if any changes done to her face – which is quite beautiful – should be done for cosmetic reasons or societal pressure, should be done because she says it should be done. I wonder, however, what her life will be like. What are the consequences of leaving well enough alone? I also wonder whether or not she is indeed a goddess. If we are all created in the image of God then she may be closest to his image than any one of us. Lastly, now that the world has beheld her, there is a crucial point here – that of poverty and vulnerability. The parents will require an advocate because of the great possibility of exploitation. I hope that there is a benevolent benefactor out there who will look out for Lali and her family’s interests. And not to undo all that I’ve said, but we don’t know, perhaps the parents are very well equipped to address all her needs above their own, perhaps they have the fortitude to withstand outside pressures whatever they may be, and perhaps they are psychologically stable enough to give Lali a life as close to the norm as possible. But if there is any small need that they may have, then I do hope they get the support required.
Comment by Miki April 8, 2008 @ 9:24 PMGreat insight.
Comment by 06jk April 8, 2008 @ 10:05 PMIn my sociology class semester we studied the same idea with people who are born transgendered. We often seek to rectify the problem and assign a sex immediately, basically reinforcing the idea that a human life only holds on to its worth when it can achieve a state of physical beauty, or at the very least, normalcy.
it is like…all those people wanting to touch her for a blessing…to take take take…from the poor…
yet left them impoverished and walked away with their blessing…..
there is nothing the human race will not exploit…
GOD help us all…
Comment by wordsseldomsaid April 8, 2008 @ 10:25 PMFascinating! It would be amazing to see this person as a figurehead in culture in the future. To destroy her God-given difference would to eliminate a precious gift. It may look like coal on the outside, but underneath, hidden under the soot lies the diamond. But that is one person’s opinion, and may the wisdom of the parents prove best. Thanks for posting! May Jesus bless.
Comment by ArtIsLight April 8, 2008 @ 10:28 PMThat’s a great insight, 06jk. Society does place a very strong pressure on people to be ‘normal’ rather than to be themselves.
Lali reminds me of the thalidomide babies who were fitted (at great cost and with great fanfare) with prosthetic limbs to replace those which they lacked from birth. Only one problem: they didn’t really miss their arms and legs, because they’d never had them. The huge effort to fit them with artificial limbs came at their expense, and was motivated by society’s belief that everyone must want to be just like everyone else. Everyone is better off “normal”.
Once they were released from the societal demand to use their artificial limbs, they performed at a much higher level of physical fluency and were, naturally, much happier.
Comment by raincoaster April 8, 2008 @ 10:55 PMI don’t think surgery would be a good idea. The baby has only one brain and would likely die. If she’s ok as she is and is healthy and strong, why not leave her the way she is? She’s lucky she’s born in a country that can accept her as she is. God chose her to be extra special. There are enough normal people on earth that aren’t really normal.
Comment by Jessica April 9, 2008 @ 12:32 AMI agree with you Jessica. Leave the lovely child alone and let her live her life in a non judgmental society …. oh and away from the media hype too !!!
Comment by 70steen April 9, 2008 @ 1:56 AMNeither Western nor Eastern norms and philosophies should be appeased – only the wishes of the child herself as she becomes mature enough to decide.
Comment by Scott Thong April 9, 2008 @ 2:09 AM“let her live her life in a non judgmental society”
Do you mean in complete isolation?
A society that believes her to be an incarnation of deity is not exactly “non judgmental,” nor even less judgemental than a society that assumes a chld will be happier if she resembles other humans more clodely.
Comment by robert martin April 9, 2008 @ 4:45 AMA society that believes her to be an incarnation of deity is not exactly “non judgmental,” nor even less judgemental than a society that assumes a chld will be happier if she resembles other humans more closely.
Comment by robert martin April 9, 2008 @ 4:46 AMCome on folks! All this religious mumbo jumbo is ridiculously naive. This child, which some might consider “beautiful” or “special” has a serious birth defect that must be evaluated by a qualified medical professional. Extremely few cases of live-born cases of Diprosopus are known to exist; most not surviving to term. Those that do survive often suffer complications that are beyond the visible manifestations of the condition.
This is not a case of an imperfect nose or boobs that are too small that must be corrected simply to conform with our Western notion of “normalcy”. This child will not be able to lead a normal life in her current condition, except perhaps within the confines of her rural village. Even at that, is being revered as the incarnation of a goddess considered to be a normal life? I would say not.
Comment by H. Stevens April 9, 2008 @ 7:42 AMH. Stevens, but the question is: Is a normal life the highest and best there can be?
Comment by raincoaster April 9, 2008 @ 7:57 AMIn some countries, being “normal” and “female” is probably the worst there can be.
Comment by LindaC April 9, 2008 @ 8:04 AMfortunately, it isn’t up to any of us to “let” her do this or that or do nothing at all. Although it seems sometimes we Americans think we should dictate how the rest of the world lives. I would certainly be torn about leaving her as is or trying to ‘fix’ her. Based on the photo, it doesn’t look like she will be able to comfortably look straight ahead, and perhaps won’t be able to walk. Her parents seem like they love her and are capable of making the right decision.
Comment by anne of michigan April 9, 2008 @ 8:59 AMI think that if she doesn’t have any health risks, they should leave well enough alone.
I like the questions that you raise and that other commentators have too. I also think that here in the West, we would have sought to rectify something that quite possibly needs no rectifying at all.
But what’s this discussion about normalcy? First of all, there really isn’t such a thing as normal and second, I’d like to ask H. Stevens what’s so bad about her being raised and living her life in her rural village? You speak as if a grand, sparkling destiny was taken from her because of her deformation, which I daresay is not the case. In fact, she might have been *given* a grander destiny. And if she’d been born without her condition, chances are she would have lived and stayed in her village anyway. And maybe this way, with people seeking to worship her, her parents will be able to take care of her, feed her and themselves a little better than was the case up until now. “Celebrity” is not a bad thing per se.
What I’m wondering is whether she also has double optical nerves, how her vocal chords lie and whether both noses “work”. I think that if anything, this might lead to issues that will take time to get used to and overcome.
Thank you for posting about this!
Comment by nyota0uhura April 9, 2008 @ 11:24 AMShe should stay where she is to be worshipped as a God. Which mouth would she talk out of….well the person above me addressed it
- http://www.anythingblack.net
Comment by imaG April 9, 2008 @ 11:29 AMI agree; leave the kid alone. I did, however, recently see pictures of a cat like this in the US. There were fears at first that the cat wouldn’t be able to function, as it appears to actually have two brains. (One face can be asleep while the other is awake.) There was pressure on the owner to give it up for science, but she won’t do that, loves it, and it is doing fine. I assume this baby will do just as well. I’d love to meet her or see an interview with her when she is older.
Comment by O'Maolchathaigh April 9, 2008 @ 11:40 AMFascinating – and thought provoking.
My first thought was – facial widening…hmmm. In Chinese tradition, ‘wide’ – including facial features – is considered ‘yang’ – the feminine principle. So, this would be considered ‘ultra-feminized’. And in her Indian culture, she is seen to be a reincarnation of a goddess….
But, quite apart from that… if impoverished parents in rural India had a girl-child whose birth defect was NOT considered ‘holy’, that girl-child would likely be fed something to choke on within moments of birth. This unpleasant task usually falls onto the paternal grandmother. This way she would be returned to the God of Death, so she could be reincarnated into a more fortunate form.
It is likely that being considered a reincarnation of a goddess is he only chance at a life – any life. So, regardless of what we may think about ‘being normal’ and ‘fixing’ her face, or how things would be best, at least she gets a chance at living.
Comment by xanthippa April 9, 2008 @ 11:43 AMHoly crap. I guess life will go on.
But I think the kid would have an easier life if its face was fixed (if it could be fixed), IF it lived in a society without two-faced gods.
Also, there is totally such a thing as normalcy. Its called having only one face.
Comment by Eric April 9, 2008 @ 11:46 AMWow. It is certainly amazing what genes can produce. All social issues aside, the first thing that came to my mind was, “Imagine her voice!”
I don’t know what that says about me. But, more and more, I’m coming to believe that that though expesses my firm desire to see this child grow up and be loved as much as and by as many people as possible.
Go ahead! Worship her if it gives her the best life possible. Much better than the alternatives (I’m sorry to say) that I can come up with.
I can’t wait to hear her voice.
Comment by Daniel April 9, 2008 @ 12:02 PMGreat post Fracas…
Very deserving of the “Hawt post of the day”.
Comment by skywindows April 9, 2008 @ 12:36 PMH. Stevens: Did you read the article? Medical practioners said that, “in Lali’s case, doctors say she is fine and everything is going well. ”
So, medical issues aside, if she was lucky enough to be born in a country that can appreciate her unique qualities, then why should they risk killing her to “fix” her? From the point of view of a Hindu, she doesn’t seem to be broken. From their point of view, she is blessed.
Comment by Elizabeth April 9, 2008 @ 1:20 PMAlthough it’s very unsettling to look at I agree the baby is lucky to be born in a country where she’ll be worshipped. But in all honesty, the western reaction to “fix” her would be in large part to the ridicule she would face from other children and adults, who can be mean and ignorant.
Comment by chocl8t April 9, 2008 @ 1:45 PMI’m somewhat shocked by some of the things I’m reading here. So many of you want so badly
to believe that “everyone is special in their own way” that you’re being blinded by the
reality of the situation. Lali should be thoroughly evaluated by competent medical professionals
who can only then offer their advice to the child’s parents. I’ll go out on a limb and presume
the parents are uneducated (I didn’t say stupid) and that such advice might help them to make an
informed decision about what to do – if anything. I totally disagree with those of you who say
they should wait until the child is old enough to make her own decision. There is probably
significant neurological involvement in this deformity so if there is any possibility of
giving this child a chance at a normal appearance, then the time to do it is when she is
an infant where the brain and other systems are most adapatable. I can’t believe O’Maolchathaigh
compared her to a cat! Because a cat seemed to live a normal life and was loved, we should make
the same choices for a human! Reality check!
Perhaps there is nothing that can be done for Lali. In that case, nyota0uhura would like to
believe that Lali will be perfectly OK in her remote Indian village where she will be worshipped,
and as a result, her parents will better be able to take care of her and feed her because of
her “celebrity”. I’m sure nyota0uhura would never advocate a freak show but is this any
different? Back in the day when freak shows were popular, many of the “differently normal” people
who were displayed made decent money and lived better lives than they might ordinarily have.
Did that fact make their exploitation any more moral or ethical? I see little difference here except
that people are coming to see Lali and give offerings because they see her as a god and not a freak.
It would be a huge injustice to the child if the parents chose not to treat her for this reason. If
her condition is untreatable then perhaps this destiny is not so bad.
In response to Elizabeth who suggested I didn’t read the article: Well I did read it and I wondered
who these “doctos” were that were given such vague reference and said all was well. I also read some
other articles where I came across the quote “Singh said he took his daughter to a hospital in New Delhi where
doctors suggested a CT scan to determine whether her internal organs were normal, but Singh said
he felt it was unnecessary.” Well there you go Elizabeth. From outward appearances in the first
few weeks of the child’s life, everything seems to be going well. I also read the medical
literature on this condition (did you?) and the possibility that everything will continue to
go well is unlikely.
Maybe some of you recall a similar event last November when an Indian child who was born with
Comment by H. Stevens April 9, 2008 @ 2:22 PMa conjoined twin giving her 8 limbs was being revered as the incarnation of the goddess Lakshmi.
Her parents faced similar difficult choices but ultimately decided it was in the child’s best
interest to remove the conjoined twin. They realized there were unscrupulous people who wanted
to exploit the child and not so naive as to believe that she could remain in her village to be
worshipped her whole life. For Lali’s benefit, I hope her parents seek out the best advice so
they can make a choice that’s in the best interest of their child.
First, the child is a “she,” not an “it.” She’s female.
Second, her face cannot be fixed. This is not like conjoined twins. There’s only one body, one heart, and one brain. You’d have to cut one of the faces off, and that would probably result in her death from bleeding and trauma and all that (remember she’s only a month old). So, screwed up as her life will be, I think the only option is to accept it. I do hope that her family has the strength to resist the temptation to “sell” her, to use her to gain money. Although, with them already accepting blessings of money, I dunno if it’s possible…
Comment by Questioner April 9, 2008 @ 2:25 PMI’ve not added opinion to the comments, preferring instead, to allow readers the opportunity to share theirs without my giving the impression I desire to debate anyone. I don’t. I’ve enjoyed considering the varying viewpoints of everyone so far.
I thought I’d add links where you can read more if you choose. Some of you seem eager to learn more, and I think that’s great.
I’ve found:
Facial Duplication – From the site of a plastic surgeon.
Comment by fracas April 9, 2008 @ 2:46 PMABC News – A more comprehensive news story.
One case – description of a med article detailing the operative correction of craniofacial duplication in an infant male
I think it a wonder. it also wonderful that she is healthy, maybe its a sign, “normal” is not really the way to go but just to hold on to what you have, for don’t many “normal” people have health problem but Lali is not
Comment by Andrew April 9, 2008 @ 2:53 PMShe will grew and with the years her conscious about herself will grow too. About her condition , her traditions, how she is considered by her country and how she’ll be considered abroad…
Right now she has to grow well loved, well feeded, well estimulated to receive all the emotional and educational support possible.
Comment by fcassis April 9, 2008 @ 3:01 PMIf i had a child with 2 faces, I would have feel a lot of mixed feelings: impotence, ignorance about how and what to do, fear , maybe guilt, disconfort with the people staring, love, proud, and I would need to feel that I would do EVERYTHING for her to know what she has, and struggle to improve her perception of her capacities and habilities to live a good and interesting life. Some people have difficult or complex lives.
frederica
Wow!, is that true what I’m reading?, “lovely child”, “leave the kid alone”… from which disney movie did you come out?, are you living in a colorful mushroom in bamby’s forest?.
Comment by normalguy April 9, 2008 @ 3:03 PMThis is life, full of wolfs and lambs, hunters and rabbits. Does this little innocent baby has no right to be happy?. We have to understand human animal is a social animal, even if we don’t like it sometimes, as a society we live through the culture in which we are inmerse. Feeling different and deep isolation make us just die of pure sadness, that’s in our genes. Don’t you think this baby girl will feel isolated and deeply different from every other surrounding her?. I think that is just not fair, and god has nothing to see with this, (one have to exist first)
wordseldomsaid has gotten to the heart of the matter…all the other responses are just cliches in a sea of conjecture…
Comment by jay April 9, 2008 @ 3:13 PMIf you are deeply religious then this is hard to say, how can you reject what your faith tells you and what this baby might possibly represent? How could you? How dare you if you really fear for your soul and family?
If you are not then most would likely say that this child has a defect, possibly harmful to her health and that her parents + the people are neglecting her.
This an age old debate, those who arent deeply religious can never understand.. and I am not religious at all.
Comment by costumesupercenter April 9, 2008 @ 3:23 PMrobert martin …. maybe judgmental was an in correct phrase.. I just want this child to be left alone. But if she is left in a world where she is adored rather than shunned then that is the lesser of the 2 evils. Let her live her days in love rather than the ‘nip and tuck’ , ’so she looks like she should how we accept’ world we live in. The poor thing should be left in peace and happiness of those who love her,
Comment by 70steen April 9, 2008 @ 4:47 PMProbably I have not put this so well but I feel if it was my child I would prefer her to be loved as she is than put under hours of surgery … I will say no more
It occurs to me that there’s a common cliché: “God Works in Mysterious Ways”.
We don’t know if the child has siblings, do we? Are there other children who can receive the benefits of their tiny sister’s situation? Is this child’s presence in the village benefiting more than just her parents? And so many people have made pilgrimages of faith to touch her feet and receive her blessing… what about them? Isn’t God helping them too?
If I recall, there was some kid born about 2,000 years ago who was put on the world just to go around blessing people for a while.
Personally, I’m on the side of those who say to leave the child alone, and let the world turn by itself.
–E
Comment by elfinugget April 9, 2008 @ 6:31 PMPersonally, it should be the baby’s health that comes first. If the kid is doing fine as-is, maybe she should be left as-is unless problems appear later. Then again, I’m not her parents so who am I to say?
Comment by Jordan Morningstar April 9, 2008 @ 6:59 PMAs a parent you tend to love your child no matter what. Life throws you some very difficult situations sometimes and you just have to make do. Unless she is suffering theres no reason to operate. As a parent, I know I wouldn’t. It must have been a shock to see her born with 2 faces – but we have to remember she is not just that picture, she is a living breathing baby – and most probably adorable. I think as she grows we may be surprised at our Western cultures reactions to her. It may actually be one of awe rather than ridicule.
Comment by louise79 April 10, 2008 @ 2:04 AMI agree with Jordan Morningstar & louise79. If any problem comes to surface later (probably concerning her health), hopefully her parents and the villagers would find a solution. Lali is a real human baby and should be treated as one. I know we all care (and wonder) for her, despite our different perspectives. If her people believe she is a reincarnation of their goddess, let them be. It is their belief. We aren’t supposed to argue on whatsoever religion (unless it brings world destruction along with it, then yes)
As far as we are concerned, she’s living well so far. Maybe she is just fine as she is (though I do wish she could get her health checked once in while so as to detect any serious problems).
Comment by glaize April 10, 2008 @ 3:02 AMWell, all of these points are moot as the doctors have said that removing the excess features would be impossible. There’s really no “fix” for this. The extra facial features are functioning parts of her body. She blinks all her eyes and can feed through either of her mouths. Sure, maybe her parents should have her checked out for other health problems but as they say, she seems to be perfectly healthy.
If it was a question of removing excess parts to give her a more normal life, then I would probably agree with that. But it’s not really an option so I think for her parents to just want to shelter her and be okay with locals coming to worship at her feet is not such a bad thing.
Comment by faranaaz April 10, 2008 @ 9:06 AMI agree with glaize. There will probably be some health issues for Lali in her life. For right now she is doing well. Later, if her parents decide to, she can have the CT scan. She is only a baby and should be taken care of acourdingly. It will not be known until later, when she has grown some, what other needs she may have. She is not a freak show either, she is really quite beautiful.
Comment by kea409 April 10, 2008 @ 9:12 AM[...] Related Post on IllSeed Related Post on fracas [...]
Pingback by R34l-L1f3 5up3rh3r035 #2: ‘Dur64′ « f15h 0u7 0f H2O April 10, 2008 @ 10:01 AMkea409 said,
“she is really quite beautiful.”
agreed…
Comment by wordsseldomsaid April 10, 2008 @ 11:28 AMHey, H. Stevens, I didn’t compare the baby to a cat. I said that a cat seemed to have the exact same “deformity” and was alive and healthy, so I felt that meant the baby also had a good chance of survival. Doctors said the cat wouldn’t live, and that two brains would make live difficult for it, but it lived and walks and eats. Given that one animal can survive, I suspect that the infant human animal can also survive, and the parents are not cruel for not getting the infant to a specialist. I don’t believe it is an issue for us what happens to the infant. If the parents want medical help, then we’d all pitch in, but if they are happy with the situation, and the baby thrives, then it is not our place to judge – that is I read into what people here were saying. Maybe the kid will need medical help, maybe not. I don’t regard such a child as a freak, or ugly. The cat pictures prepared me for these pictures. I thought the cat was ugly at first, but no so much now. The baby human looks fine.
Comment by O'Maolchathaigh April 10, 2008 @ 11:28 AMas long as she is worshiped, AND taken care of for the rest of her life, good for her.
It’s strange really, people worship something for so long, then at a certain age they bail out hoping for the next miracle, i don’t get it..
http://www.clayton-nichols.com
Comment by claysol13 April 10, 2008 @ 11:53 AM06jk, I’m wondering if you were referring to intersex people instead of transgender people. Intersex people have genitalia of both sexes or intermediate between the two, and often people will “correct” them to match one sex or the other after birth, which can cause problems for the person later, as they may identify with the other sex. When someone is transgender, they identify with a gender that is different from the gender that is assigned to their physical sex. Then there’s transsexual, where people feel like their physical sex is wrong (they may get sex reassignment surgery). So an intersex person could be operated on and then turn out to be transgender or transsexual, but you can’t tell if someone is trans at birth. But sometimes transgender is used as an umbrella term, so maybe that’s why you learned it that way? I hope that makes sense and that I didn’t get anything wrong (I’m just learning myself, and there’s not always a lot of agreement on the terminology). Anyway, you had a good point.
As for this baby, my first reaction was that the picture is amazing. I don’t want to be too positive about it because I’m sure it will cause her problems in some way or another, but given that she’s healthy, I think it’s so cool how much variation there is in the world. It seems like a lot of people take it for granted that things that aren’t “normal” are bad, but I don’t see any reason why they have to be.
Comment by judgesnineteen April 10, 2008 @ 11:57 AM[...] One more thing to think about, in terms of whether different is bad and in terms of how much variation naturally exists among humans. [...]
Pingback by Sex, Gender, and Sexuality: eppur esistono « Girly Thoughts April 10, 2008 @ 12:09 PMLe bébé est affreux mais je m’attendais à pire.
Comment by Richard Belair April 10, 2008 @ 1:52 PMIt’s a disgusting baby but I was expecting worst.
Comment by Richard Belair April 10, 2008 @ 1:53 PMDoes anyone know how her vision will be affected, having 4 eyes placed in that way?
Comment by Cecily April 11, 2008 @ 7:34 PMwow i love the way you are so dead on about the difference in the way the world works … all i can say is that i think they way they act is beautiful … they not only accept her differences but they they praise her for it and believe she is beautiful for it …
speaking as a person with a rare condition … and living here in the west i know its hard to measure up to the standards of beauty … but i am happy she is in a place where she does not have too …
as far as the question of her parents having operations to change anything … i personaly feel that if it is not broke don’t fix it … but don’t leave it broken either …
Comment by Ellen April 11, 2008 @ 8:24 PMI am wondering if this little girl isn’t actually 2 little girls sharing one body. After all, if there are two brains, than this is more of a siamese twin, and she will have two souls and should have two names, not one. It appears the brains are separate, which would mean we have two people.
Comment by Peggy April 11, 2008 @ 10:52 PMThey keep referring to she, not they. Both eyes blink?
Comment by bradley April 14, 2008 @ 4:25 PMAre they sure there is not two brains? I read the parents refused a brainscan. Are they sure it is a parasitic twin? I guess the only way to tell is if the mouth and eyes move in sinc. I read she eats out of both mouths. That doesn’t sound like a cranial facial duplication to me. It sounds like two seperate children.
This is awesome and i dont think i’ve ever heard or even thought of something like this happenning. ROCK ON ;)
Comment by Munky Doodle April 14, 2008 @ 7:17 PMAnomolies such as this occur, but most don’t survive.
Why the villification of Canadian or American culture?
Being proudly American, I would like to say that the “culture” referred to by fracas is not common to our community in Western Pennsylvania. It is more commonly observed by us via Hollywood, NYC or San Francisco or LA. We aren’t all shallow. Most of us are too busy working to be bothered with excessive vanity here, but we love our kids and would most likely want the best treatment available for the healthy survival of our children. Why is that bad?
Isn’t the plastic surgury capitol of the world somewhere in South America?
I wish Lali well.
Comment by Marjory April 14, 2008 @ 9:47 PMI haven’t replied to each comment here, because rather than appear to be debating anything, I wanted readers to be able to just say how they felt without worrying that someone will argue.
I’ll just address Marjory, because she specifically referred to something I said.
Marjory –
vil·i·fy (vl-f)
tr.v. vil·i·fied, vil·i·fy·ing, vil·i·fies
To make vicious and defamatory statements about.
“Vilification” is a bit dramatic and clearly either overkill, or you’re terribly sensitive about something. I am being realistic, not vicious and defamatory. I myself, am a Canadian. I see what I see and I call them as I see them. You cannot deny that a baby born with Craniofacial Duplication even in your state, wouldn’t be rushed into corrective surgery based on appearance rather than healthy survival.
You may say your community isn’t concerned about such things… you may choose to label such ideals as “Hollywood, NYC or San Francisco or LA” but in doing so, aren’t you just doing what you accused me of? Why the vilification of Hollywood, NYC or San Francisco or LA? Your comment seems to be one of “Oh, we’re better than that here in PA because we don’t live by those values.” You sound quite hostile towards citizens of part of your own country, yet seem upset with me because you’ve assumed I am.
Isn’t that what I was pointing out? That western culture in general, cares more about those things than the Eastern culture… they see her as a blessing the way she is! So you find it acceptable to label and villify part of your own country for that very thing I said, but then take offense at being included in that “western” type of thinking. Hmmm. Very curious.
And by the way… a lookup of the IP address logged with your comment and a bit of google showed me that there are plastic surgeons listed in your town/city. I won’t divulge that name, but since you did name your state as PA, I’m going to link to the directory of plastic surgeons for PA. If as you say, where you live people aren’t concerned with that kind of thing… how do those surgeons eke out a living? I can’t imagine you’d expect anyone to think they aren’t doing the same kinds of very appearance driven surgeries that are being done all over the USA and Canada.
Like I said, I’m just being realistic and making an observation. Why are you so sensitive about something that’s proveably true?
I’d be curious to know whether stats would show that the majority of consumers getting plastic surgery in South America were native to the region, or whether they are others, coming to the area for cheaper procedures. Kind of unfair, if that turns out to be the case then, to label them the plastic surgery capital unless it’s their own citizens having the surgeries. I’m not saying thats a fact… it’s just something I’d be curious to look up.
And I believe there hasn’t been a person commenting here who doesn’t wish Lali well. I’m sure we all do. Discussing the issue doesn’t mean any of us don’t wish her well. You probably didn’t mean that, but I thought I should clear it up.
Comment by fracas April 14, 2008 @ 10:44 PMI’m a nurse, and so I find this baby fascinating. I want to know all about her physical condition, internal structures, brain function. God, what I would give to study her! As her parents are satisfied to leave things as they are, the opportunity to learn about her is not likely to happen. Which is only right. They deserve their privacy and the right to live with their own decisions. I’ll certainly be praying for them and wish them the very best.
Comment by Cheryl April 18, 2008 @ 8:05 AMThis beautiful little girl is loved and wanted by her family. She has been given the opportunity to live her life, unlike the tiny little baby who was rejected by his parents, killed because he wasn’t perfect, and carved up and displayed on the internet in the name of science – and, of course “choice”. It will be interesting to see if Baby Lali, in later years, considers her unique beauty a gift, or if she wishes she had never been born.
Comment by ND Girl April 28, 2008 @ 8:46 PMi understand the parents painm my parents head me in the basement for 18 years they cooked my meals all the time but they did not want me out the house at all because of what people might say about me i was also born with 2 faces but i had it remove 5 years ago byu a privet doctor i go to school now and i’m still learning how to spell and type i have a family of my own now so i just wanted to leave this comment for that little girl.i will prey for you love scout king:) :):) :):)
Comment by Scout king April 29, 2008 @ 6:54 AMi recently had a baby and when I read this story I immediately thought how I would feel if I had given birth to this child. Shocked would be mildest of emotions – I regret to say that rejection would have probably have been my next.
I have always assumed that the multi-limbed/faced Hindu gods were artistic representations of their multiple attributes. However stories such as this has made me reconsider – perhaps they were real people and my understanding and faith has been too narrow.
There seems to me that there is something wrong with our western culture – western medicine says that these extraordinary people need to be fixed, they need to conform to be accepted. However in an indian village which has not been assimilated into the Western way of thinking and the home of one the oldest religions she is cherished for her uniqueness.
May God bless this child – one day she may even be our saviour.
Comment by Cally May 28, 2008 @ 6:52 AMCheryl – Wishing them the best is something I suspect nearly everyone does. ;-)
ND Girl – I could be wrong, but I think people with disabilities are rarely the ones who wish they weren’t born.
Scout king – Your choice to say those things has me speechless.
Cally – I’m not sure what you mean by your last statement, but I share the wonder at how she is cherished for what we would reject… and I too wish every blessing for her.
Comment by fracas May 28, 2008 @ 11:40 AMThis is not the first child to be born with this condition (I don’t like the term defect). For some reason, when twins are developing, they split in various ways. The result can be conjoined twins ( I don’t like the term Siamese twins). There are many, many ways that the development ends up. When the split only goes as far as two faces, that is one of the many adnormalities that can take place. My precious little niece was born with her brain in a sac that was out the back of her partially formed skull. She lived in the hospital, then at home, for eight months.
I do hope that doctors can do corrective surgery, as best as possible, for this baby in India with the two faces. I ask you commentors, how would you like to be a 10-year- old, a 20-year-old, etc., with two faces? Honestly? As in my niece’s condition, the brain can sometime be successfully placed back in the head. Unfortunately, for my niece, it couldn’t be done.
On another note, I was sorry to hear ‘professional people’ saying that the baby born with the eight limbs had a ‘parasitic twin’. That was a case of a conjoined twin, too! No matter how far the development went, still it was two human beings. And I believe there are two souls for those twins. When the two extra arms and the two extra legs and the rest of the extra body part were removed, I would have given that ‘twin’ a proper burial. That term ‘parasitic twin’ should be changed to something more respectful of human life. There are other medical terms that can be descriptive of this condition. I’m surprised that medical professionals would use such a term, when another term can be just as applicable.
Comment by Deedee July 3, 2008 @ 5:43 AMit seems to me, not that i know so much, like it would hurt her if they cut off one of the faces, or whatever people mean when they say ‘fix it’. but if it’s gonna be better for her to have only one face, well do it! it’s pretty wierd, and if she wasn’t being treated as a goddess, then she’d probably get bullied or killed or something. so if she’s not going to die shouldn’t everybody just deal with it? this is the parent’s desicion, and if Lali’s brain is ok, hers.
Comment by Deb August 19, 2008 @ 9:01 PMthere’s these two girls that share a body and basically just have a head each and they just control half. western girls. {i think their names are abbey and brittany}. why didn’t the parents have one of the heads cut off at birth? probably the same reason Lali’s parents didn’t get a face removed.
I can’t believe this posting! You’re comparing a rare genetic condition – one that it so rare we don’t know how it might impede her life over time – to not fitting a perfect standard of beauty in the West? First of all, this child maybe worshiped but she will always be an object to people. She may never have a normal life, marry, study, or work. These are very real possibilities for her. She can’t just be “fixed.” She can’t have it removed or reshaped. This is not about a simple metaphor for how people in the so-called “West” have superficial values. This is about a real person.
She may be treated like the reincarnation of Durga but how does that make her any different than a freak show? She and her family will probably start to rely on the donations from others. What if she decides she doesn’t want to bless people all day? No more money. No more love.
Be careful to assume that her country see her as “normal.”
Comment by Anita November 20, 2008 @ 7:27 PMDeedee – If you read the entire post, you’d see that craniofacial duplication is not related to conjoined twins, it’s a separate condition.
On this I agree… medical professionals aren’t always concerned enough with the people behind the conditions they talk about.
Deb – You make a very good point to consider.
Anita – Anita… my post was cleary written to promote thought and discussion. I did not give an opinion as to whether or not I think correction should or shouldn’t be done, so you’re outrage is a bit misplaced. I quoted the physician’s assessment that she is not suffering and in acceptable health.
I also placed the word ‘normal’ in italics. Usually, a reader would understand that this means I am not using the word literally. I personally, do not believe in ‘normal’ and have 2/3 children with conditions that made some people consider them not ‘normal’ at different points in their lives. The italics were used to convey that perhaps we have created a culture for ourselves, where we should question our need to ‘fix’ everything and anything. Deb made a valid point about conjoined twins (though this isn’t a case of conjoining) because it shows that every case where a birth is very far from what we expect, a decision is not always made to “correct” it. Lali’s doctors did not say that she would or is suffering. This should be at least considered.
Lastly, your “No more money. No more love.” comment strikes me as a sad thing to say. It assumes that Lali could never be capable of anything other than issuing blessings for money. I didn’t read it that way. The article clearly said the people wanted to touch her out of respect. Where you see all of that as a negative, I see it as the people there treating her as something special and not a freak… something we could stand to learn over here.
My post asked people to consider the differences in how we think about these differences in perception. You clearly see her as no different than a freak show and so have made my point fairly well.
And you’ll notice… I still haven’t given an opinion as to whether or not she should have corrective surgery or not. It isn’t the point. The point was about us thinking about how we think about people.
60+ comments later, I hope that’s what people are at least trying to do.
Comment by fracas November 20, 2008 @ 10:13 PMAccording to this
Comment by Ismael December 30, 2008 @ 3:23 PMSeptember article on an Irish online news site,
Lali Singh passed away only a few weeks after all the media attention in early April. For all the publicity her birth created, her death caused hardly a ripple.
i think that baby lali’s is at most amazing“~!it would be down right mean to even think about cutting off one of her face’s`~!to think thatshe would even get made fun of or treated badly let alone killed just because she has two faces is a sicking thing to even think about`~!i would to be able to meet the infumas baby lali and read about what might come about in the near future about her`~!as well as knowing how it will afect her growing up like exp will she be able to grow up and be able to have children of her own and what her childrens chances are of haveing the same kind of thing happen to them
Comment by christina February 14, 2009 @ 9:47 PMi love baby lali
Comment by christina February 14, 2009 @ 9:48 PM