Filed under: Addiction, Blogging, Canada, Crime, Drugs, Health, Internet, Kids, Life, News, Notables, Opinions, Parenting, Rant, Rants, Stupid, Stupidity, Uproars, Video, YouTube
Sally D.
Sounds pretty harmless, doesn’t it? Might be a friend of your kid, might even be a nickname for something, similar to how where I’m from… folks nick the Salvation Army Thriftstores as the “Sally Ann” or the “Sally Ann Boutique”.
Wrong.
Sally D, the diviner’s sage, or the sage of seers, are street names for a plant called Salvia, a powerful hallucinogenic that’s still legal in many a place, despite its growing usage by adolescents and teens everywhere. While Australia has made it illegal to possess, distribute and consume salvia, Kenyon Wallace of The Canadian Press, states via this Canada.com article:
- “The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration lists salvia as a “drug of concern” but it has not been banned by the U.S. federal government.”
and
- “But Health Canada says it can’t regulate the use of salvia divinorum until there’s more evidence of its dangers.Department spokesman Jason Bouzanis said salvia has been known to cause hallucinations, out-of-body experiences, unconsciousness and short-term memory loss. But that’s not enough to declare it illegal.”We can’t make any recommendations to place salvia under the Controlled Drug and Substances Act schedules until we have sufficient scientific and empirical data that concludes it has the potential for misuse and abuse,” Bouzanis said.”
Excuse me?
Perhaps the folks over at Health Canada should spend some time following up on teens in the real world.. you know, like a parent would. I’m pretty sure they’d gather data in a hurry that way.
For example:
1. This thread in the forums over at Nexopia (a Canadian kind of MySpace).
2. Or this one.
3. How about watching videos posted on MySpace, of their trips?
4. You can watch Salvia trips at YouTube if you don’t like the MySpace videos.
Now, I had a choice to make here. I was going to post a sample video here, but most of the Salvia related videos at YouTube are flagged:
- “This video may contain content that is inappropriate for some users, as flagged by YouTube’s user community.To view this video, please verify you are 18 or older by logging in or signing up.”
Briefly, I thought I should not post any such thing here. I then realized how stupid that was. Pretending that kids under 18 aren’t viewing the videos there when in a lot of cases, they’re the subject matter and clearly have access to these videos anyway, my not posting one would only deprive adults who should know, of knowing. Just as MySpace, Nexopia and the other social networking sites are full of kids under their “age requirements” who lie about their age (thanks to third grade math which taught them how to calculate a new birthdate to make themselves appear old enough to the sign up forms), so too is YouTube.
And so, fracas signed up for YouTube, in order to show you. By searching for Salvia alone, it returned 2,230 hits, totalling 20 pages of video clips. By searching Bad Salvia Trip it returned 13 videos. Here are two:
Salvia renders some people incapable of speaking for several minutes. As a mom, I watched this girl and all I could think of was, “What if she was really in trouble, can’t articulate it and everyone is laughing, thinking it’s funny?”
Could someone please tell me why this is a good time?
In this video, one of the 2,230, a user wearing a camera on his head attempts to make a sandwich. The caption for the video reads:
- “Guy attempts to make a sandwich while high on salvia. I think any lawmakers worried about salvia users ‘driving a car’ should view this, and rest assured – no one is dumb enough to drive a car when they can’t even make a sandwich.”
I disagree. Salvia is legal and we all know how many dumbasses are out there drinking and driving or smoking weed and driving. Why should anyone think they aren’t stupid enough to smoke Salvia and drive? We should all be worried about that. This video was viewed 39,884 times. By the comments, it would seem that the majority of viewers are drug users. The only people who don’t know about Salvia right now, are the adults, the parents. How many young people do you think might be out there driving or doing other things while on it?
In fact, in the following video, the users are… in a vehicle. So much for dumbasses thinking dumbasses can make good decisions.
Comments left by viewers after assorted Salvia videos:
- she’s having a mild trip since she’s just laughing. If you trip hard then you basically become retarded and can’t speak.
- That’s fucked up. Damn, can you imagine how deep in thought she was? Then her friends just laugh at her when she’s in desperate need of comfort….Sad, truly sad.
- salvia is a mild Psychedelic. IF you take any Psychedelic and exprince fear terror or such. USely means you have a unstable mind and are not ready to use Psychedelics. i advice to heal you’re mind befor trying Psychedelics.
- i think that more people have bad trips then good trips while high on salvia.
- overly-intense experiences
- fear, terror and panic
- increased perspiration
- possible difficulty integrating experiences
- higher doses can cause inability to control muscles and maintain balance: falls are reported.
- While sub-threshold effects are somewhat innocuous–leading some people to be cavalier in subsequent experiences–once full effects are achieved, many people find S. divinorum to be unpleasantly overwhelming and more scary than fun. As has been found with pharmaceutical kappa-opioid agonists, salvia is aversive for many who try it.
- Do not operate heavy machinery. Do Not Drive.
- Use a Sitter. Some percentage of users will attempt to stand up and move around during the salvia experience. Having a sitter present can reduce the chances of injury or other problems.
- Individuals currently in the midst of emotional or psychological upheaval in their everyday lives should be careful about choosing to use psychoactives such as Salvia as they could possibly trigger even more difficulty.
- Individuals with a family history of schizophrenia or early onset mental illness should be extremely careful because strong psychoactives have been known to trigger latent psychological and mental problems.
Find me a teen who isn’t going through some type of emotional or psychological upheaval, and I’ll show you God Himself, walking the earth wearing a Saskatchewan Roughriders jersey.
Clearly, Salvia is not something our teens need to be messing with any more than they should be messing with meth, speed, cocaine or any other drug.
Individual U.S. States are moving to deal with the growing problem. For a breakdown of laws around the world, see this link.
I found this information in a short time, all by myself, so all in all, it would seem that if lawmakers really wanted to do something about this, the tools are out there at their disposal. As a Canadian, and a mom, I say shame on you Canada!
81 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
















My goodness, these side effects aren’t much different from PST (post traumatic trauma.) Fun? I don’t think so.
The guy who was trying to make a sandwich reminded me of the time I was in recovery after abdominal surgery, whatever they gave me made me completely forget how to work the phone or even use certain words. It was the worst most awful feeling.
This salvia may have serious medical properties and even therapeutic uses, but it certainly should be classified and off the streets.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention fracas.
Comment by hazel8500 April 10, 2007 @ 1:39 AMI’ll continue to read up on this topic.
Hi! You have such good information at your blog too.. It pains me that your comments are off. Damn those spammers.
The paypal post is a great one. You’ll save someone out there from hell, I’m sure.
And thanks for the vote at fuel my blog!
Comment by fracas April 10, 2007 @ 1:56 AM(PTSD?)
About time I learn something new about drugs. ;-) I actually hadn’t heard of this at all … Which really does strike me as odd, considering the number (and types) of people I talk to.
Comment by Mark Steel April 10, 2007 @ 5:50 AMNice post. I really wanted to reply with something that made this entry look silly, but I can’t. I have to agree that a lot of people do seem to be treating Salvia with disrespect, I just wish there was a way to control it without messing it up for the rest of us who are discreet and responsible users. Salvia is not quite the same as “meth, speed” or “cocaine” and is something you can use, if you are so inclined – to further your spiritual practices. Is it really fair to make out that someone approaching it in this way is a drug addict, and deserves a criminal record? That’s what will happen if you make it illegal. I am curious what is more of a problem here – using Salvia, or making silly videos for the internet? I could argue that kids are doing hazardous things for their health by recording wipe-outs on skateboards, does that mean we should make skate boarding illegal? A Salvia high from plain leaf will give you a rapid heart rate, it will last about three minutes. Using an extract the odds are if you use a hot enough flame and inhale very deeply in a short enough amount of time you will lose cognition and motor function for up to five minutes, any further disorientation fades rapidly. It is not addictive, and most people realise this is not something you can use recreationally – in other words there is little appeal. There is a very large appeal in getting people to watch you being a dumbass on tv. I think a lot of those videos involving Salvia are exaggerating the effects, or show the effects of other substances (no substances at all sometimes – entirely an act). I think best you focus on the making stupid videos thing, chances are we will be running out of Salvia soon anyway – it’s not easy to mass produce…
Comment by eggy April 10, 2007 @ 11:22 PMThank you for saying it was a nice post but I can’t help but notice the “backhanded” type compliment it was. The rest of your comment seems to lean towards the “drugs are harmless if used right” opinion, which is entirely lost on me.
The purpose of the “silly” videos was to educate people who aren’t aware what their kids are doing when they “go to a friend’s house”. As a mom who has had a child in rehab and learned far more about drug use than I ever wanted to, there’s not much anyone can say to sway me to the other side. In my opinion, drug use aside for the purpose of actual medicine, is stupid… plain and simple. If that offends, well, I can’t say I’m sorry to offend. I am seriously offended to see kids throwing away their lives for the sake of getting “fucked up”.
In my opinion, the use of substances to alter brain function is hardly “spiritual”, that’s an excuse to use. It really isn’t any different than someone getting drunk and calling it a “spiritual” experience, or someone suffering a mental illness that involves hallucinating calling that a “spiritual” experience.
When anyone who wants to defend the abuse of substances in order to get one’s self “fucked up” for a thrill, sits in the shoes of a parent who can’t sleep because they’re sick with worry that this will be the night they get the call saying their kid is dead and they need to come identify the body… that’s when they’ll figure out that the most “spiritual” thing a person can do is honor the body their maker gave them by treating it with respect, using it as it was intended and stop abusing it with shit to make them feel “spiritual” when in fact, they were “spriritual” all along just by being alive.
Comment by fracas April 10, 2007 @ 11:38 PMFor eggy…. if a Salvia high gives you elevated heart rate for about 3 minutes and that makes for a spiritual experience…. maybe you should try running laps or jogging. The elevated heart rate will last much longer… which means, by your definition, your *spiritual* experience will last much longer. And if that sounds stupid, maybe an elevated heart rate isn’t really a spiritual experience?
Any substance that can cause you to lose cognitive function and motor skills is affecting your cerebral cortex. You only get one brain in this lifetime. Sure you want to mess with the only brain you have without knowing if there are long term effects?
Comment by LindaC April 11, 2007 @ 12:28 AMWell since it was in the post, I shouldn’t have to say these again, but I doubt eggy paid attention to the negative effects listed. I didn’t make them up, they came from Erowid.. and site used often by those wishing to justify their drug use. Where did I learn about Erowid? From teens, quoting their info to show how “harmless” drug use is and justify theirs.
So… eggy didn’t comment on the negative effect of fear, terro and panic that can occur with Salvia use. It’s a crapshoot. Until you use it, you don’t know if that will in fact, be your experience.
What about inability to control muscles? Your heart is a muscle. Can eggy prove that someone out there isn’t going to have a heart problem due to this possible effect? Oh… and the fact that a person can be rendered incapable of communicating for several minutes would mean valuable time lost in communicating heart trouble.
Hmmm… and then there’s the psychoactives have been known to trigger latent psychological and mental problems. Yeah, that’s great… so a 5 minute “spiritual” experience can leave a kid with psychiatric problems. Gee.. oh, that never happens right? Sure, tell that to a good friend of mine who works the ER and can tell us about the kids who come in freaking out after overdosing on Gravol. Guess what they see most often in their “spiritual experiences”… bugs, spiders, etc. All over the place. They too, can be left with lasting psychological effects.
It’s all stupid.
Like you said LindaC.. they should get their “high” from healthy physical activity and at least they’ll know they’ll have afuture that doesn’t involve random flashbacks and psychiatric problems because they wanted to be “spiritual”.
Comment by fracas April 11, 2007 @ 12:48 AMA lot of the people talking about spiritual experiences in relation to drug use wouldn’t know spiritual if it bit them in the arse.
*sigh*
Comment by LindaC April 11, 2007 @ 12:56 AMI guess it was a bit much to expect myself to sound like the voice of reason in this.
Comment by eggy April 11, 2007 @ 5:43 AMI’m not trying to defend the use of Salvia by kids, I wish they would leave the stuff alone until they got to an age that they knew better.
All I’m trying to point out is people need a more clever way to approach these things, as opposed to being alarmist.
The alarmist reaction ends up interfering with people being able to get a job or not because they have a criminal record.
And that’s a very large burden for someone that might have been using Salvia responsibly – who gets thrown into the same camp as someone acting irresponsibly.
If my comment seemed “backhanded” then I apologise – it was not my intention. I do not condone the “drugs are harmless if used right” opinion either, but I do not agree that Salvia is a drug if that is the word that is used to describe meth, speed and cocaine.
I disagree that these videos are an effective means to educate people on what their kids are doing when they “go to a friend’s house”. I suggest it’s more about trying to draw attention at any expense, lets face it – competition is fierce, and kids love to be popular, do you really think they are being put there for such a good reason as trying to educate parents over actually trying to impress their friends? Then you need the idiot’s guide to raising teens.
The use of (many, many) substances (amongst other means) to alter brain function for spiritual reasons has been well documented, in fact the initial context that Salvia was being used in was for spiritual reasons. I did not intend to make it sound like three minutes of rapid heart rate equates to a spiritual experience – I was trying to make it evident that most attempts at using Salvia are failed attempts. A successful attempt on the other hand usually results in discouraging any further experimentation, which brings me to the “negative effect of fear, terror and panic” – in this context probably a reaction to complete ego deconstruction – not many people can handle observing the death of their conditioned selves, with ideas of who they thought they were and how they thought reality worked. In a sense even the story of Jesus being crucified could be a metaphor teaching us that deconstruction of the ego is something we should aim for, and therefore spiritual. Certainly it is a fairly common theme in other systems of belief. But hey, if it’s Church on Sunday parading around in your new fancy dress and checking out the abs of that hot young priest that does it for you spiritually then please be my guest.
With regards to health, psychological and mental problems we could enter a lengthy debate. The side I would align with is the one that says education would be just as effective as, or even more effective than, prohibition. Prohibition has not won the war on other, real drugs. Why do you expect it to win suddenly here?
I think you are getting a bit too caught up in watching these videos, do not get so shocked if it’s shock value the kids want. Odds are the Salvia videos will get too boring soon enough and then it will be on to the next big thing that shocks the world, or at least, that shocks your world.
If education was more effective, then my “open and honest about drugs” generation wouldn’t've raised a bunch of dumbass teenagers who’ll try and get high on everything from garden plants to bug spray.
What the majority of “education” does is show kids, “Oh, they did it, and they’re ok!”
The problem is, the little brats have no self control any more. And that’s hard damn thing, as a parent, to teach.
Comment by Mark Steel April 11, 2007 @ 10:13 AMEggy… I’m glad you came back and aren’t a drive by. I do like good conversation. I now that there is much historical data about people using mind altering substances to achieve spiritual revelations. I just don’t think that’s what is happening for the most part.
I have known way too many people that use mind altering substances because they like the buzz or the high… and end up living a life that is little but working to support their habit. They become lousy employees, lousy parents, and lousy partners.
For the most part, when substances are discussed today, we’re not talking about a white robed guru who is at peace with life puffing on a peace pipe to achieve religious clarity. We’re talking about someone who wants a buzz because they’re NOT at peace with life and life becomes about the buzz. Big difference.
And really, IMHO, fully grown adults can make their own decisions. If someone can pay their mortgage and bills and wants to get high, that’s their business. It’s when they can’t pay their bills and need “help” that it’s a problem for me because I don’t think society should have to bail them out.
With kids, I tend to like the “scared straight” avenue. Take a young wanna-be gang banger and throw them in jail with hardened cons for a day and often they rethink their decisions. History shows it works. Kids use substances because they want to be cool. I think if they saw how seriously uncool they can end up, it might make them rethink their decisions. But then again, maybe not. What do I know? lol
Comment by LindaC April 11, 2007 @ 10:44 AMWell I couldn’t agree with Mark more. You’d think I paid him to say that. Linda too.
Eggy, you seem to really need to convince people that supporting substance abuse is ok. I’d like to know if you’ve ever had to parent a drug-addicted teen? If not, then perhaps you should try a little harder to listen instead of teach.
From your comment, it’s clear you thought I was saying the videos were put there by the kids in order to teach the parents. You then chastise me for thinking that the kids are putting them there for any reason other than showing off to their friends, telling me I need the idiot’s guide to raising teens. Unfortunately, it’s you who didn’t pay attention and is jumping to all kinds of conclusions rather than try learn something other than what you want to think about substance use. I was not referring to why the videos are on YouTube, I was referring to why I put the videos here at my blog…. to educate the parents. Frac.. kids aren’t readers here for the most part, and I am painfully aware of what kids will do in order to impress their friends. I have a 20 year old, a 16 year old and a 10 year old and have been an involved aunt and friend to the raising of close to two dozen other teens.
It’s unfotunate too, that your opinion of church is so narrow. It does help me though, understand why you defend the use of mind-altering substances to have a “spiritual” experience. For the record.. I attend church in my jeans and running shoes and see no need to “parade” myself around unless someone notices me on the street and happens to offer me a stint as the next “everyday” mom in those commercials on tv where the mom goes about her daily business as though she were a runway model. In addition… I have yet to see a hot young priest’s abs, because when we see them (for the most part) they are wearing robes and other garments that cover them from neck to toe. I must say though… that our 5″8″ gray-haired little ball of fire attracts a lot of young people to church. Not for his abs though, but for his sense of humor… he tells a great joke.
Point is.. clearly you live by a lot of false assumptions and generalizations about people. That’s sad. While you lecture about “ego deconstruction”, it’s obvious you haven’t experienced it yourself save for the three to five minute experiences offered by the use of a substance. Try it without a substance and see if you don’t then understand what a real spiritual experience is. Call me crazy.. but I think that was what Jesus was wanting us to experience.
There is little that kids do that shocks me anymore. My teen has pink, blue and purple hair (dyed that way by me), more piercings in her face than I can count, and attends a school where if you want to be shocked… you probably could be. I’m aware that teens will and have tried to get drunk by drinking too much water (you can die), will abuse cough medicine, gravol, virtually any prescription drug they can find at home or buy from someone else at school. I’m aware that many of them cut themselves, some of them like to play “cheat death” games. I’m aware that many of them are silently (or not silently) suffering from anorexia and bulimia. I know kids who’ve tried to kill themselves by taking bottles of Tylenol (wrecks your stomach and your liver but you don’t necessarily die), by swallowing razor blades, by overdosing on prescriptions, by jumping off the local bridge, by hanging themselves and by jumping off the roof of their home. I know they will try get high with just about anything in any cupboard anywhere… because all they have to do is get on the internet and find a site where some dumbass is willing to tell them how doing (fill in the blank) was a blast. Ask my friend, the ER nurse… how much of a blast it is to see them in the ER. So no.. you probably can’t say much to shock me and the only reason I go to YouTube is to find examples to show others, so that they (who often think I must be making this stuff up for how stupid it is) will believe it and know what they’re up against as parents.
I present information to other adults because they deserve to be informed too. Personally, if you’re a legal adult, I don’t give a shit what you do. But if you or anyone else steps outside of what only affects themselves… and distributes pro-drug information to those who are not adults, then that’s where I will indeed have a huge bone to pick with you. Pro-drug websites and shit like that do more to harm teens than “help” other adults who are just minding their own business and if you think that isn’t true, then you need the idiot’s guide to who uses the internet and how.
Comment by fracas April 11, 2007 @ 1:48 PMquote:
the most “spiritual” thing a person can do is honor the body their maker gave them by treating it with respect, using it as it was intended and stop abusing it with shit to make them feel “spiritual” when in fact, they were “spriritual” all along just by being alive.
That is really the best I’ve ever heard it put. Short sweet direct to the point, and covers all the basis.
Comment by hazel8500 April 11, 2007 @ 10:19 PMLovely. Thanks. By now my comments would have been removed from other places.
Comment by eggy April 11, 2007 @ 11:23 PMSupporting substance abuse is NOT ok.
Neither is prohibiting Salvia because idiot kids disrespect it.
My “lecture” on ego deconstruction was in response to being made to look like a fool for bringing two words together – drugs & spirituality.
And here I get made to look like a fool once again as apparently I was lecturing about it because I am some kind of authority on the subject that has managed to overcome my ego. I do confess to having one, I would like to emphasize that defeating it can be construed as spiritual development.
Of course my opinion of the Church is narrow. It’s hard not to be critical of a sterile institution whose claim to fame is a feather in the cap of schoolyard bullies everywhere, and not because it manages to deliver on it’s promise of “eternal salvation”. It’s hard not to be critical when something that was meant to spread a message of hope was actually just being used as a good excuse to wipe out any native cultures/ practices that did not comply, to spread pain and suffering via colonisation. It’s hard to believe in what the Church has to say when it was responsible for preventing people from reading, writing, and doing maths, not to mention taking two hundred years to be persuaded to allow people to believe the earth was not stationery and that the sun did not rotate around it. The Church can take credit for killing over 300000 people in the most heinous of fashions for the most pathetic of reasons, including for the traditional use of naturally occurring substances to explore altered states of consciousness and for any repercussions that could be deemed “spiritual “. The Church removes direct spiritual experience from your list of responsibilities even though the landmark figures in the bible were prophets who had access to “mystical states”, or were “divinely inspired”. You think they had those experiences because they were “chosen”, or “special” in some way and that there is no man on this flat earth worthy of God speaking to….? Continue turning your blind eye if you want to.
I understand the Church functions quite effectively as some kind of ethical support structure for society, that it’s a good place to network and meet your neighbours and it provides a sense of community etc. On what it teaches you that exists outside of your physical body it falls hopelessly short though. For an ever increasing number of us that are more interested in this than a “gray-haired little ball of fire”, for those of us willing to take responsibility for their own spiritual development, there is a willingness, nay, a drive, a sense of urgency even to explore any other means available that suggests a potential learning curve. If it comes in the form of using a “drug” that has been extensively used by cultures the Church failed to completely eradicate traditionally as one such means then this option should be available free of any legal repercussions.
Prohibition does not distinguish between idiot kids and earnest seekers (even if they are “legal adults”). You selfishly target Salvia as a way to stop kids from doing other stupid (but also legal) things. Do not be surprised if despite succeeding in making it illegal, they will continue being stupid. In any event, good luck with your campaign. Personally, I would rather stop giving kids expensive computers, unlimited bandwidth, a camcorder and copious amounts of free-reign.
From my side an entry on my blog (a pro-”drug” website) thanking anyone responsible of irresponsible behaviour that stirs up the wrath of anxious parents and so mess up the responsible use of Salvia/ Entheogens for the rest of us.
PS: Mark, I did not mean for education to be made the province of a bunch of varsity dropouts from the 1960’s.
Hi Eggy. I can’t comment on the religion parts, because I tend to be anti organized religion. Too many of them are filled with hypocrites that wear religion like a Sunday dress. So I’ll zip my lip on that subject. lol. I don’t think you look like a fool for putting the words drugs and spirituality together. Native people did it for years. I just don’t think that’s what MOST people today are doing. If I counted all the “pro-drug” people I know, I’d run out of fingers and toes – and I don’t know any of them that do it for any other reason than because they like getting high.
IMHO, I don’t need to “seek” spirituality any more than I need to find my feet or the nose on my face. It’s part of me – the essence of who I am. I am what I do. What I do demostrates the spirit of who I am. We are spiritual just by existing. Religion is optional. Opting out of organized religion does not mean I opt out of being spiritual. My opinion only, of course.
Incidentally, no one can make you feel like a fool without your permission. You own your emotions, no one else does.
Comment by LindaC April 12, 2007 @ 12:13 AMI love you guys.
Comment by eggy April 12, 2007 @ 12:33 AM:o)
Hmmm… Thanks for that. Obviously it shouldn’t be for a bunch of ageist, pedantic Humanities students, either. *flip!* Fracas wrote a blog with the intention to educate. I made a realistic statement given that I’ve traveled the world and watched kids kill themselves on a daily basis because, after being “educated” in their school systems about drugs.
It amazes me that “Don’t blame the drugs, blame the user!” comes out of so many peoples’ mouths, when the same logic is rarely applied to Gun Control, War or Corporate Responsibility.
Comment by Mark Steel April 12, 2007 @ 5:15 AMeggy, it takes a lot for me to delete comments. I don’t usually take a stand on an issue until I’ve done my homework and so once a stand has been taken, I can hold my own so don’t see the point in deleting what others have to say. After all, you have a right to your opinions just as I do mine. Heck.. I didn’t delete ‘mal henderson’ from the petition page comments, despite his insistance that if we were only “bred sufficiently” and “educated sufficiently” we’d agree with his opinion (presented as fact) that mental illness is a myth. Oh.. and to ice that cake, he “apologized” for arguing with Linda and I since he “thought” he was arguing with men and once he realized we were women, he agreed to stop since arguing with women was like arguing with a pig. rofl.
So anyway.. I think we have a bit of trouble seeing each others’ views; understandable given how very different our experiences regarding drug use has obviously been. I’d like to promise that I’ll try consider your opinions when I ponder my own, but truthfully… I won’t. I’m just being honest.
I got to mine based on what I’ve seen and lived and when considering both sides, your side doesn’t really have enough to back it up. I understand you feel it deeply because it affects you, but in life, there even far more adults who misuse drugs as Linda points out, for the sake of getting high as opposed to using them to achieve a spiritual experience.
I understand why many people are so opposed to organized religion, and I’ve had my own gripes about false people. The thing is.. as someone who started out preferring to be hung upside down with my head in the toilet rather than be part of a church or go down that road, then choosing to try it, then finding myself in the position of having my family harmed by certain members of the church, I’ve learned one really important thing.
There is something valuable to be gained from being part of the church, and to let fallible people take it away from me is just not the right thing to do. Hell, I fuck up and so why should I not expect others to not fuck up? I can compare why I choose not to totally give up on organized religion to why I still send my children to a school. Organized education is often full of bullshit, inadequacies and wrong-doing. However, there are other benefits to it and so the thing to do is to try work with the people in it, to achieve the best that can be. I know some leave and home-school just as some leave organized religion. I don’t call down people who choose those roads so I fail to understand why so often, those who leave organized religion feel they must call down those who stay.
Regarding the use of drugs to achieve spirituality, I just don’t agree that it’s necessary. It’s not a truthful spirituality, it’s a false condiditon you’re imposing upon your brain, not unlike the “spritual” experience you’d have if you huffed enough permanent marker fumes. It frustrates me that people can’t see that.
I’m not telling you to go to church if that’s not for you. It’s not how I operate. I am saying that you (nor anyone else) don’t need to use a substance to experience spirituality. You are spiritual, you are holy just by being alive. Ask someone who almost died from cancer or some other disease, if they don’t understand how just being alive is being part of something greater. You don’t need drugs to tell you that.
I don’t know what church you’ve experienced, but mine certainly does not remove direct spiritual experience from my list of responsibilities. What I’ve learned, is that what people think the church is teaching them, and what the church is actually teaching them, are very often, very different.
What I know, is that we are all expected to treat our bodies as though they are a temple. That obviously excludes getting “fucked up” on drugs. We only have this one body to last our lifetime. Don’t we get pissed when we buy our kids some costly new toy or gizmo and two weeks later, the thing is broken, ruined by disrespect? I imagine God looks down on us abusing our bodies in the same way.
You have no guarantee that the drugs and methods you choose to find spirituality, aren’t going to someday be the reason for irreperable brain damage. If you say you can, I will have to stop paying attention to your comments because that would just be silly. The kids who are using these substances are still in the stages of life where their brains are re-wiring and experiencing necessary alterations. Drug and alcohol use during this time causes damage. You suggest I am selfish for wanting these substances made illegal because it deprives people like you. I counter by suggesting you are selfish because you want what you want regardless of the cost to our children. The very children who are to be your future and whom you may have to rely upon as future health care professionals, etc. when you are suffering from brain damage from a “spiritual” experience.
A measure of a society is what they do for their young.
I know that kids will still do stupid shit even when the stupid shit is illegal. You know what the benefit is from certain things being illegal? It gives those who need to deal with a person in trouble, the legal means to get that help.
I won’t be changing my views any time soon. I understand people like you, who want to use these substances, will be angry with people like me. That’s your perogative.
But please do feel very welcome to hang out here, comment and what not. I also promise that my disagreeing with you on this issue won’t mean that I can’t joke with you or agree with you about something else.
Comment by fracas April 12, 2007 @ 4:18 PMBeing as I am in one of the videos that is posted on this site, I feel I have a few things to say. I guarantee you all I am healthier than most, if not all of you as I work out daily and don’t push fat down my throat. So the whole comment about running around a track for 3 minutes? Lame. I’m not a drug abuser and I also guarantee you that half of the people commenting on this have tried ACTUAL drugs like marijuana cocaine, or smoke regularly, etc etc all of which I do not do. Seeing as most of you commenting are adults and have lived through the 70’s era and know that adolescents do want to experience new things, I don’t understand why you think you are not being hypocritical. I only did Salvia once, was with 3 people to monitor me, I don’t find it spiritual and I definitely wasn’t trying to get high, those are assumptions. I have a 3.8 gpa in college and yes I do care about myself. The reason why they haven’t banned it is because it does NOTHING to you in the long term. I respect you talking about it but it’s the truth. No Salvia is not fun, I don’t want to do it again, but it did make me thankful for what I have and who I am. And no matter how you argue that, it’s the truth.
Comment by Jaclyn April 14, 2007 @ 8:32 PMSo while you all parade around about your great parenting skills, swallow this: most parents never know that their kids are drug abusers. And if you think your kids are ever going to tell you, think again wondermom.
Think I should get to an age where I understand better? I’m 20.
So, the facts: I’m not drug addicted, I’m healthy as hell, and chances are I make better grades than most of your kids. The end.
I don’t feed trolls. Anyone else?
Comment by Mark Steel April 15, 2007 @ 8:17 PMFor Jaclyn, should you return. The grades you make in school don’t mean diddly in the long run. Lots of drop outs and low graders are successful adults. It’s not grades that count, it’s ability to make smart decisions that count.
I read a news article about a young teen that died the first time she tried getting high with her good friends there to monitor her. The substance she used doesnt matter. Her good grades didn’t matter anymore, either. She’s dead. The decision she made is what mattered.
Comment by LindaC April 15, 2007 @ 9:03 PMMark – I try not to feed trolls, or at least to not feed them terribly often. I don’t know, the “philanthropist” in me sometimes just gets the better of me and I have to toss out a free meal or two.
If I was going to do that, I’d probably point out that for someone who brags about GPA’s and implies is smarter than the adults here, she sure didn’t get the whole point of LindaC’s comment about jogging, nor did she understand that the purpose of posting the information here was in fact, to educate the parents she taunts about them not knowing their kids use drugs.
Rofl. I thought you and Bice and the “bringing sexy back” thing was going to be my only laugh for the day but here I am, proven wrong.
Do you think bragging about being so smart at the same time as knowing your drug use is on the internet for every future employer (or college administrator) to find is not one of the funniest things you’ve read today?
Oh.. and another giggle I had…
I find it so damn funny that so many people like to scream hypocrite at anyone who tells them something they don’t want to hear. Here’s an example.
Say “Dave” is building a fence and he decides not to listen to “Stan” his neighbor, who tells him that unless he puts some concrete down the post-hole, that his fence will sag and not hold up for as long as he’d like. So he builds the fence his own way and lo and behold but his fence falls over in five years instead of twenty. So Dave decides to befriend another new neighbor, “Bill”. Bill wants to build his fence without putting concrete in the holes. Dave tells him not to, that nothing good will come of it and in fact, it will cost him dearly. Now, having heard from Stan, that Dave in fact, built his own fence without putting concrete in the holes, Bill freaks upon Dave, calling him a hypocrite because in fact, he did the very thing himself and now has the NERVE to tell someone else not to do the thing he did.
Is Dave a hypocrite, or is Dave trying to spare someone else the stupid mistake he made?
Like I said…. ROFL.
Comment by fracas April 16, 2007 @ 3:04 PMI can see your concern as a Mother but I would be more worried about alcohol or nicotine. Let’s use Ecstasy as an example here. 100 Ecstasy deaths a year, only 10 on only Ecstasy. Compare this to 100,000 Alcohol deaths a year or the astounding 0 deaths of Salvia. Yes, 0. Teens aren’t all horrible drug users and I believe experimentation is good for them to have. We need to learn our lessons ourself. I’m a user of salvia and if done safely this is completely harmless. You will always have some idiot that goes and drives, you can’t control that but don’t stereotype…your precious babies will do something sooner or later. Also, I was addicted to both Nicotine and Pain Killers because I took them to cope with the death of my aunt and about 3 close friends being raped (one on the day of my aunts death) and I can tell you that those are much harder to stop than Salvia. Salvia, along with other hallucinogens, are almost never habit forming by their very nature. Only the mentally strong can handle the vivid hallucinations. In response to your reasons for it being outlawed, they can’t do anything until further data is provided because Salvia has a psychoactive Isomer (Salvorin Alpha) and not an Alkaloid (all other hallucinogens) making it LEGAL by US standards and all other countries aside from the Aussies. Go buy some cough syrup, most over the counter cough syrups have DXM in them and will give a similar but much more harmful high. Or how about Morning Glory Seeds which contain a low grade form of LSD known as LSA. Or Meth which will REALLY mess you up..thats all over the counter stuff. You can’t stop drug use, they’ll just go huff paint. So why don’t you buy some Salvia, get a dark room and a sober person, take a couple hits and see if you don’t change your perspective. You’ll live…I promise.
P.S. I know more about drugs than most DEA Agents and for SURE more than our Police not because I’m a druggie (by piss test standards I’m clean) but because I am fascinated by the human mind and the effects drugs have on them in the same way a mechanic is fascinated by an engine or what happens when you drop a turbo in it.
Comment by All American Teenager April 22, 2007 @ 1:38 PMIt’s common for those who object to an article they find somewhere to immediately jump to the “why don’t you criticize (fill in the blank with something other than what they’re attempting to defend) instead of this. Thing is.. the argument that because there are other bad things to criticize therefore the person should not criticize the one they are presently writing about, is just immature. Just because this time I wrote about Salvia, doesn’t mean another time I won’t write about abuse of Alcohol, Nicotine, Meth, Datura, Ketamine, Ecstasy, Morning Glory Seeds, Nutmeg, Gravol or cough syrups.
As a parent, I’m fully aware that kids will abuse anything they can get their hands on, so I thank you for noting that “they’ll just go huff paint” because it carries so much more impact when admitted by a teenager. The whole point of my writing about this is to educate other parents and adults who may be out of touch or in denial and as a result, not able to recognize the signs when their child may be in need of assistance.
Suggesting I need to get high and thus will change my perspective is an immature method of defending your own actions. A guy who thinks “all women like getting beat” might suggest to me that if only I let my husband slap me around a bit… I might realize I like it is also using the same logic. Some people like to eat dirt (it’s called Geophagy) and yet, I do not need to try eating dirt myself, to know that eating dirt can be bad for a person. Similarly, I do not need to try Salvia to know that doing it isn’t a good idea.
Your response is exactly what I would expect from a teenager who admittedly uses substances, and exactly the reason I wrote this for the benefit of parents out there and will continue to write more.
Thanks for your help in showing parents what they are up against in assisting their kids to get through those years between 12 and 25.
Comment by fracas April 22, 2007 @ 2:13 PM“When anyone who wants to defend the abuse of substances in order to get one’s self “fucked up” for a thrill, sits in the shoes of a parent who can’t sleep because they’re sick with worry that this will be the night they get the call saying their kid is dead and they need to come identify the body…”
fracas, if you honestly worry about your children like this, you are suffering from serious anxiety, neurosis, and possibly depression. You should seek medical attention before it gets out of hand.
Your comment was held as spam. Being that it contained no links and no profanity, there must be some other reason. I chose to post it whereas other bloggers may have simply allowed it to be deleted because I think it’s important to show others how there are indeed, people in the world who have no clue and yet seem to think they are qualified to judge. If you ever sat with someone whose child is on the street, high on meth (or something else) and they can’t do anything about it to save their child, you’d know the statement I made is very real for some parents out there. Your comments show your own ignorance, and that’s about all. I apologize on your behalf… to any parent who may be reading this and feel offended by your statements. -fracas
Comment by Officer Fuhrman April 23, 2007 @ 1:15 AMI can always count on the blog to bring me my daily belly laugh.
“Officer Fuhrman” links to a site that offers a link to click and read his profile at technorati. This profile is for someone going by the name of “jesuswilkinson” and the profile reads:
“Police brutality and police misconduct cases, police shootings news articles, and commentary about the coming police state.”
The site he links to is all about just that…
So… this person who chose not to use the screen name they go by all over the internet (countless places have profiles for jesuswilkinson) calls himself “Officer Fuhrman” instead, lists his email address in order to post as fracas(at)policedownload.net and then proceeds to advise me that I need medical attention.
I don’t know if I could even possibly find medical attention. No, wait… I think the police have denied me the medical attention I require.
Umm… I think this is where Mark would probably post something about feeding trolls. Sorry Mark.. I know I disappoint you like this every now and then but I can’t help taking advantage of a good belly laugh. It’s good for the soul.
Comment by fracas April 23, 2007 @ 11:23 AMI agree, laughter rules! For that reason … I’m glad that there’s such a huge supply of asshats who comment on blogs. ;-)
Comment by Mark Steel April 23, 2007 @ 11:46 AMWOW!! Good discussion fracass
I thought about commenting when you first made ths post, but didn’t. Now I will.
While on vacation a couple months ago, One of my friends took some of that stuff away from their one of their grandkids. The grandson assured us it was all legal, safe, etc. Well, grandma put some in a pipe and lit it up. And promptly fell right out of her chair. Her voice got real high as she called for her hubby, and she said everything looked like a bad cartoon. It took about four or five minutes to get her back. She swears she’ll never touch it again and wishes she had never heard of it. She said it was nothing like pot.
We’re all older, experienced pot smokers, BTW, except my wife. We smoke some when we get together and play cards or watch football on TV. You know, couples things. We are also all successful. For some reason, the lathargic lazy, lack of drive that comes with smoking pot didn’t seem to hit my generation, locally, at least.
I don’t care much if they outlaw it or not. Outlawing everything you can put in a pipe ain’t gonna make alot of difference anyway you look at it. There’s always gonna be something else and kids are always gonna engage in self destructive behavior. Sometimes I think it might be easier to control it than ban it. But kids still have to learn the rules too.
Glad I didn’t smoke it
Comment by Dusty Roads April 24, 2007 @ 11:57 PMWe also kept it (pot) strictly from the kids. When I told them, after they turned twenty-one, that I smoked it, they were both shocked. And neither one of them smokes it now. So,,,,, being a hard-assed hypocrit worked for me. At least in this case.
Comment by Dusty Roads April 25, 2007 @ 12:01 AMOk, first of all, never did I once claim I was smarter than anybody here. It is just hard to sit here and read comments from people who obviously do not understand what the hell they are talking about. None of the adults here really want to confess to ever doing drugs other than marijuana (which, by the way, is the most mentally addicting drug). I am saying that it is hypocritical to wonder why kids do drugs and have done them yourself before. I mean, sure it is fair to say that you want to protect your kids. But from what? Salvia? Dear God, if that is what you are concerned about, perhaps you should restrict your child’s diets to pure protein and salads, as ONE MERE DONUT would affect your child more than a hit of salvia would.
I also think it’s unfair to categorize somebody as ignorant and immoral for using salvia. I for one am still a virgin, and have not done drugs ever in my life. Do I consider salvia a drug? I am impartial. Why? Because anything can be claimed a drug. Nicotine, caffeine, etc. etc. And those drugs actually kill and have studies done on their lasting effects. I have been more affected by caffeine than by salvia undoubtedly.
And talking about the emotional effects of something, I believe this is also a person’s choice. Do we not want to expand our minds by learning of philosophy, psychology, etc. in hopes of gaining a better understanding of the mind? We do not question why people play instruments, even if we do not understand an instrument’s appeal. Bottom line, if it is not affecting you or even the PERSON doing it, why should you have a say in their own personal choices? I have been more affected mentally attending a philosophy lecture than salvia.
Until there is hard research on what salvia does to you, do not place it into a category it doesn’t belong in. Nobody has ever died from Salvia. Salvia is different from meth, cocaine, and heroine. Anybody who claims differently spits on those whose lives have personally been affected by those who partake in LIFE-ALTERING drugs, such as myself. I have morals, I have goals. And I hardly doubt that a college or job is going to look me up on youtube, since my name is not listed, that and I am all ready admitted to college, am a member of NSCS (top twenty percent of my class), salvia is LEGAL, and am an English major wishing to write one day.
“Salvia leaf is physically quite safe. It is very gentle on the body. Toxicological studies have shown that salvinorin A is extraordinarily non-toxic. No one has ever died from a Salvia overdose. Salvia is not habit-forming or addictive. People who choose to use Salvia, tend to do so quite infrequently. Salvia is not a stimulant, it is not a sedative, it is not a narcotic, it is not a tranquilizer. Like many entheogens, at sufficiently high doses it can induce visions, yet it is quite different from other entheogens. Dale Pendell, in his book Pharmako/poeia, assigns Salvia divinorum to a unique pharmacological class, which he calls “existentia.” This term alludes to the philosophical illumination Salvia seems to shine on the nature of existence itself.”
“Salvinorin A has no actions at the 5-HT2A serotonin receptor, the principal molecular target responsible for the actions of classical hallucinogens.[18]
Salvinorin’s potency should not be confused with toxicity. Rodents chronically exposed to dosages many times greater than those to which humans are exposed did not show signs of organ damage.[19]
Many other terpenoids have been isolated from S. divinorum, including other salvinorins and related compounds named divinatorins and salvinicins. None of these compounds has shown significant (sub-micromolar) affinity at the kappa opioid receptor, and there is no evidence that they contribute to the plant’s psychoactivity.”
“Interestingly, the effects of Salvia divinorum are often mistakenly described as ‘LSD-like’ by people who have not tried it, most notably politicians and reporters. Actual users on the other hand more often describe its effects as unique (38.4%), and more like meditation, yoga or a trance (23.2%). This compares to only 17.7% of users who linked it to any of the other serotonergic psychoactives (mescaline, psilocybin, LSD, etc.).[21]”
“Salvia has not been found to be either physically or psychologically addictive. The results of the Baggot survey, which used the standard psychiatric drug dependence diagnostic framework, indicate that Salvia has little if any potential as a drug of dependence.”
Facts, people, facts.
Comment by Jaclyn May 1, 2007 @ 2:04 AMONE MERE DONUT would affect your child more than a hit of salvia would.
..”users should be particularly careful not to mix salvinorin A with other drugs, and should not use S. divinorum ifthey, or their family, have a history of mental disorders, since hallucinations may trigger mental instability (Schabner 2002, Siebert 2002).”
Last I checked, I did not need to worry about a donut triggering mental instability in my child. Some families are not open and honest about mental disorders in the family background and thus, not everyone can be certain that they aren’t at risk when choosing to use. In fact, there are probably more families out there who hide those kinds of things from grandpa or grandma’s past, than not.
Nobody has ever died from Salvia.
Ask Brett Chidester’s family about that one.
Salvia has not been found to be either physically or psychologically addictive
And every pro-drug website and kid out there will say the same thing about Ecstasy.. and yet, I watched a very real, very addicted teenager suffer through very real withdrawal. For me, all the “it’s not addictive” talk falls into the yada yada category. It’s bullshit perpetuated by those who want to validate their choice to use. Go ask a rehab worker. I’ll get you the names of several if you like.
I frankly don’t see what your statement of virginity has to do with my points about drugs. I don’t recall linking the two, and if you feel categorized as ignorant and immoral, perhaps you should ask yourself why you feel that way?
I’ve seen kids as young as 12 need to do rehab. I don’t need to do drugs myself to know that when someone young enough to still be afraid of the dark talks about how a little bit of this.. or that.. ends up being not enough and you have to use a little more, try something stronger… because what you were doing before isn’t enough to get you high enough now… I don’t need to do any drug to know that the right thing to do is be against their use.
I will say it again. Information here is to educate parents and other adults who aren’t aware of what’s out there… so they can do what they must to protect their teens and their pre-teens.
Go take care of a 15 year old who is puking their guts out, sick, tired, shaking, sweating and desperate for some drug they didn’t need to take if only someone had stopped them before it was too late. Then come back and talk about facts.
Indeed. Facts.
Comment by fracas May 1, 2007 @ 3:14 AMYou went on and on about how smart you were, Jaclyn, and how you’re right, everyone else is wrong, we’re hypocrites, no matter how we argue, the end.
Zealot (n.): Someone who can’t change their mind… or the subject.
Comment by Mark Steel May 1, 2007 @ 7:37 PMNegative effects- increased perception (WHAT THE FUCK)
Comment by tonberry May 26, 2007 @ 1:09 PMif you’re referring to the negative effects I’ve listed as found during my research, then what I listed actually said Increased perspiration.
In other words… sweating.
Wasn’t that your perception?
Comment by fracas May 26, 2007 @ 1:36 PMEveryone has their passions.
Fracas, yours appears to be a passion generated by one of your kids becoming a victim of drugs, which I can certainly respect. However, it’s important to keep perspective and realize that all drugs are not inherently “evil”, even although your personal experiences would have you err on the side of safety when making a generalization. I realize the instinctive reaction that kicks in when you have seen your child suffer in the grip of something. I’m a parent too.
Just as you would let your kids have Tylenol when running a fever, there are benefits of some drugs. Some of these drugs are naturally occurring in the plant kingdom.
I think there’s a distinction to be made here between drug use and drug abuse. Many drugs can be used to benefit humankind. Some are used as prescription antidepressants, some as pain killers for chronic or severe pain, some as blood pressure medicine, some as blood thinners. All improve the quality of life, when used as directed. When abused, all these can become something negative.
Salvia isn’t so different from these. I know it’s easy to watch YouTube and think “this is a stupid, irresponsible, pointless exercise in drug abuse”, and I’m in agreement there – 99.9% of YouTube videos on salvia DO illustrate just that. This is the problem when kids have access to something that’s beyond their experience, understanding, appreciation and comprehension. Kids play with matches, but matches are tools in the hands of an adult, and they’re not about to be made illegal. If there were YouTube videos of kids playing with matches, many adults would be enraged, and justifiably so! However, to ban matches altogether wouldn’t be the responsible answer.
So I think you’re right on the money when alerting parents to this plant – parents need to be informed, and they need to know what’s out there. But we don’t need false fears, and we don’t need to be MISinformed. We also don’t need things that are potentially beneficial for adults to be slotted into some generalization for the sake of lack of individual, responsible adult investigation. Getting on the bandwagon based on hearsay or 3rd party information or “what you’ve read” is really poor representation because you haven’t done a full investigation. Adults who have experienced salvia firsthand in a responsible manner, that try to set the record straight, are also labeled as drug users and their arguments are thereby nullified. That’s where this becomes more of an inquisition than a “fair trial” for salvia. And yes, I know there’s still that “err on the side of safety” issue… but let me expand a little on my viewpoint before you cling to that argument.
I’m a 44 year old married father of four, who has tried salvia, and I can personally vouch for not only some valid health benefits (no more work days missed due to nagging migraine headaches, thank goodness!), but for valuable personal insights that have challenged me to become a better person. I don’t use it as a joke, like those YouTube kids – I use it as part of a journey within, and that’s what attracted me to it at this middle (philosophical) age. Incidentally, I’ve never “done” drugs. Never smoked pot. Never wanted to. But salvia attracted me because it held a promise of personal, introspective growth. Soooo many people think this plant is something it’s just NOT. Its nature is not that of something addictive – any “good feelings” come at a very personal cost because it’s a tool to explore the subconscious mind. This is the aspect that scares A LOT of kids to a point that they’ll never try it a second time. They have to confront their fears, and at significant levels of absorption, they are forced to undergo deconstruction of their ego at a time in their development when their ego is maxed out at the center of their lives. This is one of the reasons why it simply doesn’t add up to be a threat to that age group: their psyche will find it to be a threat, not a treat, and they’ll go find something else to do with their time, period. Meanwhile, it may have taught them a lesson in respect, and left them knowing that they’re NOT the know-it-alls that they thought they were. The alternative is, they process what it’s telling them, and they come out of learning something.
Salvia is no more “fun” than going to your shrink and dealing with your most difficult fears or issues. It’s really not something that teenagers would want to play with for anything other than a cursory trial, and the amusement would wear off very quickly. Compound that with the fact that it’s not a “group sport” or “party atmosphere” drug, and you’ve got a pretty poor selling ticket to ride. I’d be more apt to buy stock in the “over 30’s crowd” sales of salvia, when people are looking for a deeper life experience.
Salvia isn’t for kids, I certainly agree. But it has its own self-revealing prophesy to teach them in that respect. It doesn’t need subjective, preconceived judgment by individuals or politicians that apply 3rd party information, and who are quick to generalize it (inappropriately, without first-hand experience) due to passions that are transferred from abuse of other drugs or statistics from other drugs. It’s NOT other drugs, and generalizing with this makes one as guilty as generalizing about anything else in society. This kind of approach is akin to the abused wife who hates all men. Her feelings are valid I grant you, but totally misdirected.
So parents, by all means, be aware. Read VALID information at http://www.sagewisdom.org first, so you’ll be BEST informed. But save your fears for something else. Worry about your daughters getting pregnant, or your sons getting in a car wreck, drunk or street racing. Salvia and its short-lived 5 minute “journeys” are not going to be mainstream ongoing teen fare, by the very nature of the experience.
Comment by galileo June 21, 2007 @ 11:57 AMIt amazes me the lengths some people will go to rationalize their behavior.
If you have migraines, you should try eating a saltier diet. Works every time.
Comment by Mark Steel June 21, 2007 @ 2:38 PMMark,
First, I apologize for the long post in response to your short, to the point comment.
Unfortunately, salt isn’t the solution to my migraines. I was told to cut back on salt a number of years ago by my physician due to hereditary high blood pressure, and at that time, I was borderline high. I suppose I could have told him to “go pound salt” (ha!) and give me a prescription for hbp. Or I could try some different prescription drugs now for migraines as well, despite their documented, arguably toxic side effects. Prescription drugs are welcomed by society, but I don’t buy into pharmaceuticals if I’m given ANY legal alternative (for me, these have included chiropractic, massage therapy, homeopathic, herbal/mineral, etc). I do appreciate your attempt to offer a solution to my (now past) migraine problems, but without a cross-section of my medical history, unfortunately you’re at an unfair disadvantage. Your salt comment was well-intentioned though, and I recognize and appreciate that.
I sincerely hope that most people can see the difference between rationalization of something (which suggests it’s fundamentally wrong to begin with) vs. statement of first-hand experiential fact intended to supplement a previously stated viewpoint and enlighten people so that they can base their individual impressions on a broader base of accurate information. I’m not some teen on here stating “wow man it was wicked, salvia is some wild (insert expletive of choice)”. I’m an adult discussing its personal safe use from a parent’s perspective.
You may have already prejudged salvia, just as you may have prejudged me in some way that justifies dismissing my statements without any consideration of their merit in representing the “other side of the coin”. If so, that’s your prerogative, and nothing anyone can say is likely to have you seriously consider other viewpoints on this. I have no problem with that; such is life.
But… for anyone reading this to dismiss any viewpoints that don’t concur with theirs due to the fact that the person has first-hand experience with salvia strongly suggests that this is nothing more than a witch-hunt. If you wanted to find out some facts about ski jumping, wouldn’t you want to talk to someone who has done it? Or would it skew their perspective to the point of rendering it invalid? In fairness, you should really look at the source on an individual basis and decide if it seems credible.
I’m not an addict (well, chocolate and coffee, maybe). I may drink an alcoholic beverage once every three weeks. I don’t smoke tobacco products. I’ve never tried pot, crack, coke, hash, DMT, meth, opium, LSD, huffing, etc. Drugs certainly haven’t “ruined my life”, to this point, I’ve had a longstanding and successful career in (brace yourself) personal safety, and I hold a respectable position. A major part of my work is evaluating and mitigating risk, so I’m not new to assessing the potential for danger or personal injury. In fact, I’m quite qualified in that respect, and see many things that the average person wouldn’t. But I’m also a realist who believes in keeping perspective, NOT “chicken little syndrome”. I receive stupid emails saying “watch for needles in gas pumps” or “mars is going to be as big as the full moon” and I debunk them and send them BACK to the originator with the facts, because I detest people sitting around jumping on the nearest daily bandwagon of ignorance and spreading it like wildfire.
My posting, and the link to http://www.sagewisdom.org was directed to those who are seeking the true facts, not those who had already made up their minds with no room for first-hand experiences or information that represents another viewpoint. Words like “addiction” and “psychedelic” evoke a pretty strong response, and my post was meant to reassure some parents that this plant is not some evil drug that will quickly destroy your children, and that in fact there are much more important and relevant issues to worry about. Salvia shouldn’t be categorized with E, crack, meth, DMT, alcohol, huffing – those are statistically what are putting kids in hospitals or killing them. Salvia simply isn’t. Stats don’t lie. Really! Honest!
Fracas posted some information that was relevant, but there were some some critical facts missing, so it didn’t give parents a totally accurate picture (I understand fracas’ viewpoint has been forged in a pretty high temperature fire, and I TOTALLY respect that). But by having an adult (and parent) post some additional information, it provides a more thorough summary of fact in an otherwise one-sided, and therefore limited, summary. I trust that fact IS of interest here, and I would hope this would be a welcome addition to complement what was originally published. The fact that my posting remains, and was not deleted, attests to this, and I thank you for that, Fracas.
Cast any preconceptions aside for a moment if you can. Making salvia illegal would drive it underground and make it a taboo. Now think like a teenager. Wouldn’t this give it MORE adolescent appeal, adding to the risk, thrill, and attraction? “Hey, they made that stuff illegal, it must be pretty good”. Is that course of action beneficial for something that’s never been documented as being harmful OR proven addictive in ANY way?
The fact remains that someone who wants to try hard drugs is going to pursue that path regardless. Also kids who just want to experiment are GOING to experiment anyway. But anyone who has experienced salvia will tell you it’s not the path to destruction that it’s being made out to be. I’ll certainly grant you that people doing salvia on YouTube look stupid. That’s because they’re doing it in the wrong setting, with the wrong intent. But salvia is statistically FAR safer than huffing. If you had to choose, which is better for experimenting kids to do? Something that causes kidney/liver/lung/brain damage or death, or something that’s never been shown to cause any of these problems? If you make one illegal, they’ll likely just use the other, which has significant documented health risks. Is that the direction you’d prefer for this to go?
Inarguable Fact: You aren’t solving a problem if you’re ultimately rerouting those “at risk” to an alternative with higher risk factors. Taking away salvia or making it illegal won’t take away the curiosity. Pretending it will suggests “ostrich syndrome”.
Think. For yourself. Research the facts, not the opinion of those who are unqualified to comment about salvia because they have no ACTUAL experience with this specific substance.
Oh, and by the way, Mars is NOT going to be as big as the full moon. And I’d know.
galileo
Comment by galileo June 22, 2007 @ 8:55 AMThough I’ve not been here for several days due to family obligations, I feel I should at least reply here because I know teens will be reading.
First… I usually don’t delete others’ comments, even when they’re left by rude people who attempt to argue with me and end up calling me some kind of name and running away. The reason is that I don’t usually write about something unless I feel I can hold my own in discussion. I have strong opinions and don’t deny others their strong opinions either. Why? It would only mean that I feel insecure about my own… which I do not.
Second… My information largely came from Erowid.. a site known more as pro-drug use than not, and deliberately chosen as my information source to make the whole “you didn’t give complete information” argument into a futile one.
Third – I don’t support the need for use of substances to delve into one’s own psyche. I think personal growth can happen to those willing, with nothing more than a desire and a will to examine one’s own conscience. I also am a strong opponent of the use of alcohol to “help deal with anything”. I may joke… but those that know me know that when I’m under stress, the LAST thing I will do is use a substance to deal with it or help me deal with my own inner self. I see it all as a crutch, booze, salvia, etc. I will drink for enjoyment and that’s all. My inner work is done because I choose to. I can’t support your chosen use of a drug to “improve” yourself because I think you shouldn’t need a crutch to do that. It’s my opinion, and you won’t change it.
Fourth… In attempting to legitimize use of Salvia, you are doing as Mark suggested. Justifying. As a parent, you should know that what you write will be misconstrued by kids. It’s what they do. It’s part of being a teen.
My daughter was hospitalized for a medical condition recently. While there, I met a teen boy who was hospitalized because he “fucked himself up” (her words) on Salvia. If you read more than the words you want to hear… you’ll see that one of the dangers of Salvia is that “psychoactives have been known to trigger latent psychological and mental problems.” NO ONE knows for 100% sure what is in their family background and since mental health is one of the biggest secrets of anyone’s life… even today, it doesn’t get the attention it should so how can anyone know for sure there isn’t hidden mental illness in their family background? Sure would suck hard to find out after doing Salvia, that there was mental illness in a person’s background and realize your going to suffer shit you wouldn’t have if you just hadn’t done Salvia.
All things considered, I believe my viewpoint is the more responsible one. Yours and my viewpoint compared, mine is the one that leads to better health. Mine involves no risk. Yours does. It’s that simple.
Comment by fracas June 22, 2007 @ 10:26 PMI’m going to “pass” on the crutch thing, in the interest of keeping this short. Suffice to say that your “occasional enjoyment of alcohol” is the same – it’s a drug that you ingest for a reason; and it has its chemical effects on your consciousness.
AND… although my viewpoint involves risk, it involves LESS risk than the alternatives which will inevitably still be on the menu even if salvia is somehow removed. Your risk-mitigation argument seems to be based on the assumption that if salvia disappears from view, so will any desire to experiment. Human (particularly teen) nature has proven time and time again that this is a flawed assumption. They will seek the same end through a different means, with a higher risk factor. I’m not saying “it’s ok for teens to experiment, everybody go try it”, I’m saying “if you MUST pursue these kinds of things, then make educated decisions and choose wisely”. Salvia is certainly NOT for everyone. But the “taboo to admit they might” parental denial and avoidance mindset does NOTHING to educate young people about the facts and making informed decisions, and it just hurts them in the long run. If you tell them “don’t”, they probably will. If you tell them “if you do, here are the possible outcomes you need to be aware of”, you empower them and teach them how to make decisions for themselves responsibly.
galileo
Comment by galileo June 25, 2007 @ 10:41 AMyour “occasional enjoyment of alcohol” is the same – it’s a drug that you ingest for a reason; and it has its chemical effects on your consciousness.
And I stated that the reason was enjoyment… as in the taste. I do not drink to get drunk, and haven’t been actually drunk since I myself was a dumbass teenager. If I responsibly (as in along with a meal) drink one or two of something that I appreciate for the taste (much as someone consumes a particular flavour of ice cream for the taste) it hardly compares with getting high on Salvia. I am not attempting to alter my consciousness, and take steps to make sure that doesn’t happen… whereas you have professed you are.
You repeatedly make arguments to justify your choice to use drugs. That’s your perogative for sure, but from my side of the fence, it just appears to be justification and not much else.
I’m all for educating young people… something I do frequently. Where we differ, is that those who “educate” and then expect them to use that info to make good choices are living in a bit of a fairy tale world. Part of being a teen is that nasty little tendency they have, to think “yes, that info is scary, but it will never happen to me.” Adults who “educate” but then fail to emphasize the “don’t do it” part are simply placating themselves into thinking they’ve done their job as an adult by “educating” them about something harmful.
I can’t tell you how many teens I know of who know full well, the dangers of Ecstasy, Weed, Gravol, Cocaine, Ritalin, etc. and still use them based on the “That bad stuff won’t happen to me though” theory. It’s the same with friends. If I had a dollar for every time I heard a teen say “My friend would never do anything to hurt me” only to have a meltdown later because said friend did something behind their back or such… I’d not need to work. It’s the nature of being a teen, to have the evidence right in your face and still think a certain danger won’t happen to you.
And so, because this is just what teens are and go through, adults who offer support for drug use are in my opinion, irresponsible adults. You can keep replying with words to try and justify your opinions, but they won’t change my mind. More likely, they will emphasize your need to justify what you do. You should ask yourself why you seem to care what others think about your choices. If you really and truly felt your choices were ok, you’d probably not have spent even this much time and effort trying to make me see it your way.
Indeed, teens will always look for substances to misuse to get high. Just as I wouldn’t sit down with a kid who abuses an OTC cleaning fluid or mouthwash, and instruct them on how to “safely” get high with it, I’m not going to pretend I’ve done my duty as an adult and a parent by instructing them how to “safely” get high on Salvia just because “the alternatives are more dangerous”. Both are wrong. That’s the message they should get. You are wrong and your argument is based on justifying your own choices.
That’s how I see it and I can repeat that as often as anyone likes. I have loads of patience and am also a stubborn Taurus… a combination that certainly sometimes pisses off those who don’t agree with me.
But please, feel free to participate in other, more lighthearted posts here with everyone else. I don’t hold grudges based on opinions and you’re welcome to have fun here regardless of our different opinions on this subject.
Comment by fracas June 25, 2007 @ 2:17 PMFracas,
Your personal viewpoint is shared by many politicians. Many facts based on personal experience won’t agree with your opinion, nor will they support your cause. However, it’s easy to render such information invalid simply by labeling someone a “user” or “addict”, “trying to justify their own choices to use drugs”. This same approach has been used effectively through history during plenty of inquisitions (the fact-negating premise was changed – “they’re in league with the devil” – but it’s certainly the same principle).
Unfortunately, you have missed an opportunity to glean first-hand, accurate information from someone who could have answered some of your questions and provided some meaningful insights and truths on this topic.
At least I’m not forced to recant. I’ll give you that.
galileo
Comment by galileo June 26, 2007 @ 9:02 AMYou have me pegged somewhere based on the fact I won’t support your position. That’s unfortunate. I have nothing but compassion for the “addict” and those who end up in a place they wish they weren’t, because they made a bad choice at some point in their life… I’ve seen it up close and personal. I have never implied I think anyone is “in league with the devil” for using drugs so that’s just a leap you make for whatever reasons you feel it necessary to make that leap of judgement about me.
Again, I’ll repeat that I don’t need to “glean first-hand, accurate information from someone who could have answered some of your questions and provided some meaningful insights and truths on this topic” because it’s no different than someone who huffs paint thinner trying to convince me of the same thing. Anyone using any substance to achieve a state of mind that alters them from the state of mind they don’t wish to be in (for whatever reasons they have for wanting to change their state of mind) is going to try convince the person who disagrees with that choice, of how their choice isn’t wrong and how the other non-user person “just doesn’t understand and could benefit from their insight”.
Forcing anyone to recant their opinion is a useless waste of time in my book. If something I say causes someone to change their opinion because they choose to, or because they feel they learned something new… then that’s great but as I said before, your opinion is your opinion and a forced change of opinion isn’t productive. It won’t last and I don’t see the point in trying to do that to people. It’s up to you. My stand is that regardless of how hard someone tries to change mine… it doesn’t often happen because I generally shut up about things unless I’ve done enough homework to feel that my stand is one to stick with.
I don’t reply to you to change you. Only you can do that by choice. I reply because you seem to want to convince me of your way of thinking and that tells me something. It tells me that despite all your efforts, that your replies are more about convincing yourself. I think you should think about that.
Comment by fracas June 26, 2007 @ 9:43 AM“Your opinion is wrong because you jump to conclusions. You don’t have all the facts. You don’t understand this that or the other. Therefore, you are….”
I love that shit. ;-)
Comment by Mark Steel June 26, 2007 @ 2:01 PMI know Mark. A few more people stopping to tell me I just need to get high and I’ll understand, and I just might change my mind and see the light (albeit a light that only exists for the five minute Salvia trip).
;-)
Comment by fracas June 26, 2007 @ 3:50 PMOh..and just wait and see what a glutton for punishment I am. I’ve been working on another drug topic to post shortly.
I can’t wait to see who’ll stop by to tell me I need to learn from them too.
Comment by fracas June 26, 2007 @ 3:52 PMMy replies are really for your readers, not you specifically.
Erroneous information on the net that plays on people’s fears or lack of knowledge is counter-productive, so I post in counterpoint to such errors or implications. “Chicken little syndrome” spreads fear based on sensationalism, ignorance, flawed assumptions, lack of proper perspective, or incorrect facts. I think you’re a very well-meaning person. I can only guess that you deem it acceptable, as long as the end justifies the means – after all, what are a few wrong facts, as long as it still works out in the bigger scheme of things. I realize that this is only one front of a larger battle that you wage, and again, I can only theorize that you may feel that any defeat or compromise here may weaken your overall position.
I honestly don’t think you’re “high and mighty” or a moral puritan who merely tries to push their morality on others based on “knowing better” – I believe you have a genuine concern, however ill-placed in the case of this particular substance. I state this with complete sincerity.
My “in league with the devil” comment that I made was a comparison, NOT a statement that suggests you made any such assumption. I even flagged it as a different premise, so I trust that’s cleared up.
The facts are that salvia shows NO indication of being addictive. These ARE the facts, you can’t arbitrarily change or twist them to suit your needs or passions. This makes salvia a different CLASS of chemical than most scheduled substances, and has essentially kept it from being scheduled so far. This fact also negates your assumption that someone (like me) is stuck somewhere in a bad place due to a bad decision with respect to salvia. The “pity the poor addict” comments are really wasted in that specific light (which IS the subject matter here), and as a result, it sadly just comes across either as an exercise in bad drama, or as as a feeling evoked by a religious adherence to KNOWN misinformation. Perhaps you’ve fully convinced yourself that salvia IS addictive, regardless of any counter-indications from published research.
I can respect that you have a personal war on drugs, but implying or blatantly stating facts about “addicts” with respect to salvia – renders your standpoint impotent by blowing glaring factual holes in your arguments. If you’re going to fight the fight, shouldn’t you temper your weapons with true facts?
To end, I’ll quote something back at you – try it on for size and you’ll realize that it’s a pointless statement. It can be applied just as well to your own original article, to convince people of your way of thinking and justify your viewpoint. The difference between my postings and yours are that mine are not emotionally charged, nor do they include fabricated facts or those based on hearsay. I use comparisons to put this in realistic perspective, yet you use an alarmist approach and generalize. You use sensationalism… I have been very careful to use fact. You’re passionate – I recognize this – but passion doesn’t negate or change fact.
Now, the closing quote I referred to…
“I reply because you seem to want to convince me of your way of thinking and that tells me something. It tells me that despite all your efforts, that your replies are more about convincing yourself. I think you should think about that.”
I think that should sum it all up, unless you want to challenge any of my statements, based on FACTS specific to salvia instead of emotions and generalizations about addictive drugs that don’t apply.
Again, I respect your underlying drive – but I don’t agree with misrepresentation of fact or sensationalism to meet an end.
galileo
Comment by galileo June 28, 2007 @ 8:07 AMI won’t feed the trolls.
Comment by Mark Steel June 28, 2007 @ 9:34 AMMark – You’re so mean. ;-) Trolls need to eat too. I’m not an equal opportunity troll-feeder. Some trolls I will let starve, while others I will feed. I feed them if I think feeding them will push them to reveal the weakness of their arguments. I do it not for their sake, but for the sake of the fence-sitters who read. I’m fully confident that my regular readers are intelligent enough to not require any help from me to determine that a particular individual is making fallacious arguments in an attempt to justify an irresponsible stand, but I also know that there will be teens who end up here because they searched and got this link.
The teens who are hell-bent on doing drugs will in all likliehood, not listen nor be willing to consider reason. However, the teens who are on the fence… not really sure that they do want to get into this crap but looking for a way out – they deserve my time to lead the yes-it’s-ok-because-I’m-an-adult-and-know-how-to-do-drugs-safely-for-the-benefit-of-expanding-my-horizons-argument people into showing the foolishness of their position. Invariably, they end up posting something that everyone sees through and that my friend… is what might help a teen who isn’t sure about drugs, decide not to do them.
If you notice, he continually tries to assert that my post contains “Erroneous information,” suggesting that I am not arguing with “true facts” when indeed, every bit of the facts came not from my own opinion, but from an extremely well-known drug site that is more often used to promote drug use and legitimize drug use. I’d hardly think the people at Erowid are interested in disseminating erroneous information about any drug since the majority of their users are pro-drug use.
He’s tried unsuccessfully, to maintain that my main premise was on the addictiveness of Salvia when in fact, anyone with an average IQ reading the post and the comments for comprehension will see that I repeatedly stress the fact not about Salvia being addictive, but about Salvia use having the potential to cause lasting damage to the person’s psychological well-being because as the facts show… psychoactive (Salvia) use can trigger latent psychological and mental problems. None of us (save for the liars) can say for absolute certainty, that we know we have a zero family history of mental illness and therefore using Salvia is a huge risk that should be impressed upon those considering using it. These are facts that teens are usually not made aware of before they choose to use a substance. In continually trying to present my information as erroneous, and in continually trying to convince people that rather than listen to the actual medical facts that are freely given out even at pro-drug places, that instead people should listen to him, he is actually doing a pretty damn good job of helping convince the intelligent and hesitant teen who might be reading here, not to listen to him and to see adult drug users for what they are… justifiers of poor choices who are sometimes able to use bigger words than the teens.
So that, my uber-awesome friend, is why I sometimes feed the trolls. But I agree that everyone shouldn’t feed them. It’s kind of like feeding the ducks at the pond. If everyone does it, they just get too fat.
Comment by fracas June 28, 2007 @ 1:30 PMFunny you should say all that — Actually, I said a lot of that, and deleted it for not feeling like arguing with him was worth my time …
But I would add two things.
As far as Addiction goes, the FACT is that there’s only one drug that regularly causes death when you’re coming off it — and it’s not heroin. Actually, it’s Alcohol. So if someone’s gonna talk to me about addiction, I’d prefer they get beyond this bullshit facade and talk about it for real.
As for his “fact” that Salvia is not addictive — neither is Marijuana, if you reference any printed material about it. But I certainly know a lot of people who are addicted to Marijuana. Many people will either refute that, or come back with the lame-ass excuse that it’s a purely a “psychological” addiction. Whether it’s physical or mental, it’s addiction. People don’t friggin’ get that. They wanna differentiate from Physical versus Psychological addiction based on the false premise that Physical addiction can kill you — and that’s not the case.
There are variable long term effects of frequent and/or chronic use of drugs on the body, and they’re especially true for psychoactive, hullicinogenic and illusionogenic (for the asshats out there who believe there is such a thing) drugs. The effects of Doctor-prescribed medications are very similar: Prozac, for instance, stops the brain from recycling Sodium Seratonin, leaving you with quite a few neurons that wanna fire a lot less than usual. Frequent escapism into Hallucinogenics does something similar, although they usually affect your brain’s “fight-or-flight” mechanism.
The old, “I’m so pissed — I need to get high and calm down.” But unlike a lot of other things (watching Television, smoking a cigarette, having a drink) these things are affecting your brain at a chemical level.
And that is what bothers me. “Dude, it’s not addictive!” Never mind that they’ve escaped so much into marijuana, acid — or even salvia — that they have the emotional capacities of two-year-olds.
You can see that in almost every one of them who’ve been doing it for years — that manic illogic. The, “There’s nothing wrong with it! It hasn’t affected me! The doctors just don’t want us to have it because it’s healthy!” bullshit. Conspiratorial, antisocial behavior from a “drug” that’s supposed to be calming them down?
Nice job. ;-)
Comment by Mark Steel June 28, 2007 @ 2:37 PMI hear and agree. Damn.. you people over there at blogitude just rock. I was just over there reading some Diva and thinking how it’s a damn shame you all live so far away from me.
And you know.. I know she said she was so over the whole Anna Nicole thing but heck, if it wasn’t for Anna Nicole, I would never have run into you and the folks over there.
I may have to have a shrine page about her just for that.
Comment by fracas June 28, 2007 @ 2:45 PMThat reminds me … I need to make an Asshat of the Day post again … lol
Comment by Mark Steel June 28, 2007 @ 3:00 PMfracas,
I agree with Health Canada. Maybe they’re all smoking salvia too eh?
Good for you Canada, for not jumping on the sensationalist bandwagon and for basing due process on FACT.
galileo
Comment by galileo July 10, 2007 @ 1:25 PMI know.. Good Ole Canada. We let lots of things go here, ’cause we’re so tolerant and progressive and all.
Just google for Robin Sharpe to see what I mean.
Comment by fracas July 11, 2007 @ 12:50 AMHonestly, Robin Sharpe seems just too off-topic. But it starts to paint an interestingly consistent picture of your thought process. You’re upset at Canada for a number of things because you see the “obvious moral choice” in things, and you don’t see it being carried out.
It’s easy to get so caught up in the emotions and CONVINCED of the moral uprightness of self-justified opinions, to the point that one no longer recognizes that there’s a GREATER cause that must be addressed that supersedes those viewpoints. That being, due process and representation of rights. You obviously have your passions but you seem to cling to an ideology that doesn’t coexist with reality. At least not here in Canada. Here it’s very much about due process and human rights.
Of course, it’s YOUR right to complain and express your opinions. Well rest assured that you can THANK Canada for that ability. While you’re at it, thank Canada for applying the same freedoms and rights unilaterally, not just selectively in a manner that either you or someone else thinks they should be applied. The selective approach might be one that would have you imprisoned by now for your own writings, depending on who was calling the shots. You’d have plenty of company though… maybe even Robin Sharpe!
galileo
Comment by galileo July 11, 2007 @ 9:53 AMRotflmaopmpaktd. (I’m too lazy to type that out)
Mark.. where are you? You’d enjoy this one too. Every time someone comes along who can’t convince me to see the “error of my ways” they end up at some point, putting on their “Psych 101″ hat and telling me how they finally “understand where I’m coming from” and then proceed to tell me why I have the opinions I do.
In fact, I do appreciate, enjoy and love my Country. I just happen to be a realist about whether or not any one place on earth is “perfect” or makes “all” the right decisions.
It doesn’t happen. Every country has made good choices… and bad. If I point out a bad one, it doesn’t mean I don’t recognize or appreciate the good ones, or that I have any deep seated resentment towards my country. If I did, I wouldn’t continue to live in it. In fact, while my fellow residents of Saskatchewan often carry on about why it sucks to live here, I will argue the opposite. Yes, I piss and moan about things I don’t like that happen in my province too… and yet I choose to stay in it because I can see the good things too.
Unfortunately, you, galileo, are obviously not able to understand that concept, the concept that one can love where they are… and yet see the things that aren’t so lovely at the same time. Were I not able to do that, I’d be no better than the idiot who glosses over anything negative and lives with rose colored glasses on ’round the clock. That’s just not a healthy way to live. Life is full of good and bad and everything is a balance. It’s unfortunate that you can’t see anything past your desire to defend your choice to use drugs, but since you didn’t understand the reference to Sharpe, I’ll explain it.
You held up a decision made by a part of Canadian Government as the right thing to follow, as if the Government never makes mistakes. The point of mentioning Sharpe, was to illustrate how Governments don’t always make the best choices. So… while it’s certainly a person’s individual perogative to believe the Government’s decision on any matter is the correct one, it is in fact, never the definitive and wise people don’t live by a “the Government said it so it must be truth and irreversible” stand. If we did so, we’d still think it acceptable to forcibly sterilize individuals who used to be called “retarded” and women would still be unable to vote. Your choice to turn the conversation around to once again, serve your obvious “I must defend the use of this drug at all costs” stand is just plain silly. I believe anyone of reasonable intelligence would have understood the point I was making. I don’t say that to insist that you are of limited intelligence, because clearly you are not. I say that to show you how your own “I must defend the use of this drug at all costs” stand is causing you to appear to be of limited intelligence. It is your choice to appear that way at your own expense. I’m really puzzled as to why the use of this drug is worth that much to you but have to say that I’ve seen this before… in lots of teens who will forego the same in order to justify getting high on whatever their drug of choice is.
You must understand by now that you can neither convince me of the “error” of my thinking, nor intimidate me with insults. And yet you keep trying.
Perhaps another individual out there who thinks they’re all “Psych 101″ as well, might like to comment on that.
Then again… maybe if I would just go get high I’d change my mind and see how smart you really are.
(That one… for you Mark, because I am in the end, always a smart ass.)
Comment by fracas July 11, 2007 @ 11:14 AMIm sitting here deciding whether or not to do another “Asshat of the Day” post.
Comment by Mark Steel July 11, 2007 @ 9:55 PMBesides … full-of-shit people bore me. I’ve been dealing with too many of them lately.
Comment by Mark Steel July 11, 2007 @ 9:55 PMWhy do I keep responding? Because of the greater good.
Now let’s see… let’s start with this one…
“Your choice to turn the conversation around to once again, serve your obvious “I must defend the use of this drug at all costs” stand is just plain silly. I believe anyone of reasonable intelligence would have understood the point I was making.”
You make several references to this. However, there are NO references to drugs or choices in my last posting. Bad choice of tactics.
I think my original error in all this was thinking you were somehow interested MOST in conveying truth. However, you are MOST interested in conveying your OPINION. I GET that, even though you may be misleading your readers in the process. However, there’s a HUGE difference here between it being your right, and you BEING right.
Unfortunately, not only did I think you were interested in the full truth, but I thought you could stand your ground when faced with some intelligent debate and respond in kind with facts and statistical reference. Unfortunately, the proof is very much in the pudding here.
The bottom line is, when you can’t defend your statements, you respond in a way that attempts to render the FACTS I put forward as inadmissible by attacking my credibility over and over again with the same rhetoric, or trying to make me look like I don’t have the intelligence to put two and two together. Now THAT I find quite amusing.
Furthermore, you glazed over the Sharpe case with only vague reference, which again shows the tactic of promoting emotional response without citing particulars or FACTS. Let’s dare to take a closer look…
FACT: The Sharpe case was a landmark Canadian human rights case, where the right to WRITE (or think) something was defended without it being interpreted as a confession to a crime, or to be interpreted as an offense under child pornography laws.
FACT: Sharpe was in fact, convicted of possession of pornographic pictures of children, and later, of indecent assault. His writings were, in the end, not classified as child pornography, as the act of writing them did not constitute an infringement on anyone’s rights or create a victim (although emotionally we’d all like to say that society was his victim).
FACT: Writing down a fantasy, regardless of how you or I may feel about its repugnant moral characteristics, produces no actual “victim”, and is a right of the individual. Classifying it as a criminal offense is one step away from charging someone for merely thinking something, and this is what the courts at all levels decided. Thoughts, and recorded thoughts, can not constitute a crime unless they are a confession. Sure, this elicits an emotional response, but as I alluded to, it holds up a GREATER cause, that of the right to individual thought (regardless of how warped we, the rest of society deems it).
My previous posting held up the theme of DUE PROCESS in Canada. I didn’t cite infallibility on the part of Canadian law or government, and you can rest comfortably assured that I was somehow able to piece together what you were trying to convey despite my limited brainpower. However, you missed MY point in response, which perhaps I should have taken the time to explain:
Regardless of your emotional response to these types of situations, due process in Canada in BOTH these situations is built on a foundation of legal precedent and established laws and protocols. These principles are followed in establishing legislation and during court trials.
I sincerely hope Mark chimes in to validate your opinion with his opinion. Sadly, it could have been an interesting REAL debate if you had responded with some supporting facts instead of dismissive tactics that were merely repeated ad nauseam.
Incidentally, for the record, I would NOT advise YOU to try Salvia, despite the fact you could learn something from the experience. I agree it would likely pose some serious difficulties in your particular case.
Merely having the opinion that the sun revolves around the earth doesn’t make it so. Statistics and scientific facts say otherwise. Opinions are just empty words.
galileo
Comment by galileo July 12, 2007 @ 10:54 AMReally galileo, you’re a broken record. Arguing on behalf of Salvia use and calling it for the “greater good”. Now that’s a new one.
You repeatedly insist you have all these facts and my information is all opinion. Frankly, that’s just pure hogwash, something you’ve obviously convinced yourself of which has no merit. I’ve repeatedly pointed out that the information I’ve given is from a pro-drug website, not my own opinion. Based on the FACTS given out at the pro-drug website, I conclude the risks are not worth the use of the drug. I am not interested in “addiction” where it pertains to Salvia and have not made that argument so your arguments with me are just useless twitter.
The conclusions I’ve arrived at are based on risk to mental health, clearly stated at the pro-drug sites. Unless you can prove with FACT, that everyone who uses Salvia has no previous family history of mental illness, you’re just blowing hot air out your ass when you insist you argue based on fact and I on emotion.
The FACT is… most people do not know their complete family history pertaining to mental illness. Even today with more knowledge and help available, stigma often prevails and mental illness is hush hush. It doesn’t receive the attention, research dollars, health care spending or any other type of needed attention when compared with other illnesses.
So galileo, please do make an effort to use FACT when arguing “for the greater good” because quite honestly, anyone with any intelligence at all would concluded that a substance with the risk of provoking latent mental illness that would and could debilitate a person possibly for the rest of their life… is a substance best left unused.
You continually argue the opposite and because you don’t convince me of your ways… persist in trying to make it appear that I argue based on emotion and lack of fact. In fact, it is yourself doing such.
You’ve buried (poorly I might add) ignorant insults within your last post and again, I remind you that I am aware it is likely because you are not “getting anywhere” with me. It’s a tactic I’ve seen so often it’s just amusing at this point. I’m sure you do think yourself to be making the more intelligent argument but as with every other person attempting to make an argument for something that just isn’t worthy of defending… you resort to insults and poorly concealed taunts that if I did get high I’d learn something. Very juvenile. I’m wondering if indeed you are a teen all along just pretending to be an adult.
Clearly, the fact that I’ve allowed you to continue to do so on MY blog, where in most other cases, you’d have been run off long ago, is the most telling tale of all.
At this point, you need to stop the game you’re playing… you know, that one where you blindly continue claiming you have all these facts and I do not, and address the FACTS surrounding Salvia and potential resulting mental illness. This argument has never been about addiction. Please provide absolute proof that Salvia use will never trigger mental illness of any kind that could ruin a person’s life, or take a hike. You’re behaving in a way that suggests this isn’t about facts or the greater good, but about attention for galileo.
Comment by fracas July 12, 2007 @ 11:46 PMShorter and to the point:
Can you say “narcissism,” boys and girls?
I knew you could. ;-)
Comment by Mark Steel July 13, 2007 @ 11:08 AMFracas,
You have some very valid points when it comes to negative stigma associated with mental illness. It’s unfortunate in a society that’s as “progressive” as ours, that this still prevails to such a degree.
“Please provide absolute proof that Salvia use will never trigger mental illness of any kind that could ruin a person’s life, or take a hike.”
Rather than argue semantics (there is a difference between triggering mental illness, and triggering an EPISODE or SYMPTOMATIC MANIFESTATION of a previously existing, although possibly latent condition), I think the thrust of what you’re saying is (I know this puts me at risk of being accused of putting words in your mouth, but my purpose is to clarify intent):
“Can you refute that salvia can complicate someone’s mental state to the point of substantial difficulty (or worse) in the case of someone who’s mentally unstable or who has a latent mental or psychological problem?” And if so, why should we permit our kids continued access to a substance that poses this risk?
The answer the first part is undoubtedly, no I can’t refute this. It is the NATURE of psychoactive substances BY DEFINITION to impact the human psyche. Technically, it doesn’t “create” problems, it merely reveals them. It’s like removing the gift-wrap from a present, and discovering a box. Removing the wrapping didn’t create the box, it was already there. Thus the term “latent” in your quote from Erowid.
You’ve already alluded to this several times – underlying issues, family history, etc. This can be thought of as analogous to giving an alcoholic a drink, or giving an arsonist matches – these are simply a bad combination. Yet these things can be completely harmless in the hands of someone else who doesn’t have the vulnerability. Do we ban alcohol or matches? No, we don’t. It’s the right of the individual to choose to use these, and parents’ responsibility to protect their children’s against dangerous interactions or involvement. In other words, we don’t ban them, we just don’t let kids play with them. I believe the same should be done with salvia.
I would suggest that making it illegal to sell to or provide salvia to MINORS would protect our youth as much as, or possibly more than – criminalizing it carte blanc, for the following reasons:
Criminalizing something like this doesn’t make it disappear, as I’m sure you’re well aware. For young people, it validates the alleged potency of the substance and its pursuit, creates the additional thrill of doing something “bad”, increases demand for availability by forcing it underground, and as a result, reinforces the fallback position: a criminal subculture that fills the void and caters to this demand.
Again, I recognize that you raise some excellent points with respect to stigma associated with mental history. Also, I think we all need to recognize that there are some clues in everyone’s own life that can point to potential “latent” problems. A “family history” doesn’t mean that because Aunt Martha is on antidepressants, salvia will give you a mental breakdown by default.
Individuals who have schizophrenic, psychotic, substantially neurotic, or even generally paranoid tendencies should definitely stay away. Those who have a difficult time separating fantasy from reality should likewise steer clear. For example, those who immerse themselves in role playing to the point of obsession or identifying their “self” with a character – this would raise a flag of caution. If there is a prevalent family history of any of the above… yes, all psychoactive substances should be avoided because they’re… yep, that’s it… psychoactive. AGE IS A MAJOR FACTOR because (as you alluded to) of associated stages of hormonal and psychological development.
Incidentally, for the record, the “greater good” I referred to was DUE PROCESS, NOT salvia use itself. I believe this is clear if you read my last couple of postings fully.
I think this got pretty far off the beaten path because you and I both got sidetracked on mutually exclusive opinions, instead of seeking the common ground. For my part in that, please accept my apologies.
Ultimately Fracas, I AM in agreement with your underlying premise – our kids could use some protection, they shouldn’t be using salvia. How this control is delivered though, that’s up for opinion. Carte blanc? Across-the-board scheduling? I think that would only make matters worse, and it would impact a much broader base than the kids that you’re professing that you want to see protected. Is THAT really necessary? Or can the desired results be achieved without going to an extreme?
galileo
Comment by galileo July 17, 2007 @ 11:00 AMhaving been away for a bit, I hadn’t noticed this once it was gone from the current list.
If we are in agreement that kids do need protecting, then our conversation can go no further. Unless you’d like to surprise me by suggesting you’re the parent of a teen who has gone through problems like this, then you’re only arguing your opinion from a hypothetical point of view.
That’s fine to do unless you’re arguing with someone who is arguing from experience.
So it seems we’ve exhausted this.
The whole point of my creating such posts are to educate parents and other adults who are responsible for the well-being of kids. Even the arguments made earlier by “eggy” were eventually admitted by eggy, to be unsuccessful.
I respect eggy for that.
My goal is to protect kids from themselves (and help other adults do so as well) until kids are able to do that for themselves. They think they can, but life suggests otherwise.
I will always argue with anyone (like yourself) who makes arguments that may confuse a teen should they read it.
And as I said before, despite differences in this, should you or eggy choose to remain at fracas and enjoy the other posts and converse with everyone else… you are still welcome to do so.
Comment by fracas July 23, 2007 @ 3:07 AMYep…..here’s a case of another soccer mom who thinks she’s a doctor, scientist and neuropharmacologist.
Salvinorin a is the first Kappa opiate receptor drug in the world found naturally occurring in a plant. It may have properties that could obliterate an addiction to opiates, and seems to have better efficacy as an anti-depressant than any similar on the market today, without any of the dangers of such drugs. Check out the work they are doing on this drug at Case Western Reserve University. They are actually Doctors that have an opinion about its use.
If the DEA classifies this drug researchers will no longer have access to it. This is a damn shame – since this would be a result of some lazy parents not being able to control their kids, and want to blame someone else for their bad parenting.
Why dont you educate yourself on the properties of the drug & explain to your kids that this is an non-standardized dissociative drug that probably will not be any fun for them to try.
In the future lets scientist determine which drugs may be benificial to you rather than Youtube and teenagers making the decision for you.
We finally discover wise up and discover a useful drug with no dangerous side effects, when administered properly by observing centuries of native american medicine, and we lose the ability to experiment with it because some dumb kids mom saw a video on the internet.
We could keep taking vioxx if you prefer…matter of fact why dont you put your kids on a ADHD drug right now just to make sure they dont learn anything until they are 21…..
Dr. Charles Berry
Comment by Charles Berry August 2, 2007 @ 7:36 AMWhy do you have such unrealistic views on drugs? You make a case by saying that no one should be using drugs due to the risks they pose. Yes, they pose risks (some more than others). What doesn’t? This is life, we are confronted with risks every day. People die every day in car accidents. Should cars be outlawed? I sure as hell hope not.
Your perception is that drugs are bad, bad, bad, and there’s no two ways about it. Oversimplifying things is easy, isn’t it?
I’ve used assorted drugs throughout my life (including salvia). While I am not a huge fan of salvia, I do believe it has some incredible potentional for some people. And I know what you’ll say. “Oh, but that’s just the drug putting things in your head. It’s a fake experience. blah, blah, blah.” Well, Mrs. know-everything-before-trying-it, have you ever considered that maybe these things ARE in our head, and by temporary altering our mindset these things become accesible? No, of course you haven’t. DRUGS ARE EVIL.
Keep living in that bubble.
For the record, I completely respect people who don’t feel the need to indulge in drugs. However, I do not in any way respect people that look down upon those that do and spread biased perspectives.
;)
Comment by Matt August 3, 2007 @ 6:31 PMWhy do you have such unrealistic views on drugs? You make a case by saying that no one should be using drugs due to the risks they pose. Yes, they pose risks (some more than others). What doesn’t? This is life, we are confronted with risks every day. People die every day in car accidents. Should cars be outlawed? I sure as hell hope not.
Your perception is that drugs are bad, bad, bad, and there’s no two ways about it. Oversimplifying things is easy, isn’t it?
I’ve used assorted drugs throughout my life (including salvia). While I am not a huge fan of salvia, I do believe it has some incredible potentional for some people. And I know what you’ll say. “Oh, but that’s just the drug putting things in your head. It’s a fake experience. blah, blah, blah.” Well, Mrs. know-everything-before-trying-it, have you ever considered that maybe these things ARE in our head, and by temporary altering our mindset these things become accesible? No, of course you haven’t. DRUGS ARE EVIL.
Keep living in that bubble.
For the record, I completely respect people who don’t feel the need to indulge in drugs. However, I do not in any way respect people that look down upon those that do and spread biased perspectives.
Comment by Matt August 3, 2007 @ 6:33 PMObviously, you’re illiterate. You should try reading the article rather than being the judgemental ‘tard you’re accusing her of being.
Comment by Mark Steel August 4, 2007 @ 1:16 AMI was with you fracas, until you said this:
“My goal is to protect kids from themselves (and help other adults do so as well) until kids are able to do that for themselves. They think they can, but life suggests otherwise.”
In our neck of the woods, the sooner a kid learns he better be careful, or he’ll get hurt, the better. The government trying to “protect us from ourselves” leads to a nanny state I don’t want.
To sum up the “facts” of the above discussion:
fracas says salvia is bad, can cause extreme problems for those with even minor mental conditions, and that parents should know of it, and include it in their parenting.
Galilio says it’s not addictive.
Based on the facts, I’d call this one a draw
Comment by Dusty Roads August 4, 2007 @ 8:52 AMRotfl. You take the night off to help Mr. Fracas dismantle a clothes dryer, repaiir it and put it back together, and look what happens.
Oh my gosh, these replies are hilarious.
I don’t know how anyone could, with good conscience, not also support that since the human brain continues re-mapping, re-routing connections and such (street-guy terms of course… there are more technical ways to put it for sure) with significant changes happening between the ages of 15 and 25. Keeping kids off drugs is imperative for the proper development of their brain… you know, that thing they’ll need for the rest of the fraccing life.
So… along come Moe, Larry and Curly (and though it would be funny Dusty, I wasn’t referring to you) who proceed to post all kinds of garbage directed at me. You people thorougly amuse me.
If even one person out there can justify properly, why KIDS should be using drugs, please do so.
Dusty… we don’t always agree but I luv ya anyway! I agree with what you said about the kids and the woods and that whole kind of thinking. Without being specific, I can just say I’ve done a lot of that with certain members of my own family lately… and I agree. I’m not talking about being like a nanny state… I’m talking about keeping kids off drugs. I absolutely believe that drugs and some things kids will do is completely different from teaching them how to properly use a rifle otherwise they’ll end up dead, or teaching them how to manage if lost in the woods, etc.
It’s a known fact that telling kids something is bad for them doesn’t make them “learn” otherwise there would be no teenage smoker statistics other than “no teens are smoking”.
Kids are easily sucked into drugs, for a million reasons. When we were teens, the drugs available weren’t nearly as dangerous as they are now. It’s our JOB as parents to know what the hell is going on today, and it’s our JOB as parents to advocate against this crap that is killing kids as well as creating a generation of addicts and kids with psychological problems. These kids will grow into adults that are ill-prepared to function as contributing members of society. This is going to impact future generations and for those that don’t care about that because it’s not them… then think about how you think a generation unable to contribute properly to society is going to take care of you as an old person?
I’ve spent time talking to kids in drug rehab, in the psych wards and in the high schools and challenge all of the yea sayers to do the same before they open their fraccing mouths to tell me I don’t know what the fuck I’m talking about.
I wouldn’t call it a “draw”. I’d call it that still, not one person has been able to provide good, rational, sound information, statistics or proof as to why kids shouldn’t be kept from drugs, why we shouldn’t do everything within our power to try keep them off drugs, and why doing drugs is in any way beneficial to the growing child/teen/young adult. That’s not a draw.
Frankly, if galileo wants to fry his brain and end up drooling on his pillow while some caregiver changes his diaper instead of enjoying his life as a productive member of society, I don’t give a shit. I do give a shit when people like him argue with people like me, trying to “win” the argument for the sake of feeling like their own choices are ok. Why? Because in making such ridiculous arguments with people like me (who are doing what they can to try show kids just how badly drugs can screw up their lives), people like galileo, Matt and “Dr.” Berry confuse kids who really have enough to try figure out. They’re pressured by other kids, lured my misinformation and taunted with the promise of escape from the stresses of being a teen… stresses that are tenfold what they were for us.
FOR SHAME. I’m embarassed to be part of the same human race as people who cannot admit their responsibility to the next generation.
Oh.. and “Dr.” Berry… I don’t fit the “soccer mom” persona. Sorry to burst your little bubble about what/who I am. Your IP shows that “Allocations for this OrgID serve Road Runner residential customers out of the Columbus, OH, Herndon, VA and Raleigh, NC RDCs”. Oddly enough, despite searching medical directories for all three of those states, I have not found a “Dr.” Berry listed. Should you be another type of “Dr.” all I can say is that it’s a pity that your education hasn’t served you as well as it should’ve. You’re obviously unable to intelligently provide an answer to why kids should use drugs. Instead, you chose to use your opportunity to “educate us” as to why kids should use drugs, to instead try insult me. The operative word there is “try”. Insults from those who hurl them because they can’t make their own case have no real merit on a person with intelligence and confidence.
And so I shall reiterate that these responses are highly amusing to me… oh… but wait, that must be because I’m just a “soccer mom” and it doesn’t take much to amuse me.
LOL.
(Oh.. hey Mark. Hi!)
Comment by fracas August 4, 2007 @ 10:59 AMwell, i just smoked salvia, i didnt freak out, i didnt get scared, yell, or anything. its different in every person, and its legal. the United nations says its legal. also why are you compareing salvia with uppsers, such as meth, speed and coke. both drugs do 2 totally different things, and last i checked our teens are smoking pot, nothing wrong with that, at all. i say, do alittle more research please, before fasley compareing salvia (A LEGAL DRUG) with very dangerous drugs, such as meth. also, no one is stupid enough to drive a car, or do it alone, we all know what it does, we all do it responsibally (aside from the idiots who make Youtube videos)
Comment by dibble August 6, 2007 @ 5:59 AMTo everyone that has posted in favor of keeping salvia legal for responsible adults: this is clearly the wrong blog to post to. Fracas and Mark are obviously not fence-sitters and sadly, this is how the human mind works: once it’s been made up strongly enough, attempts to convince it otherwise will only cause further alienation. The real tragedy of this society isn’t the handful of kids who’ve got their heads ruined on Salvia. It’s the way our culture has made altered states of consciousness–the foundations of culture and civilization itself, ironically–either taboo, dangerous and suspect (for the average citizen such as Fracas) or a way to get high and escape boredom (for the YouTube kids). This is why the presence of the sacred is no longer felt by ordinary citizens outside of churches.
Comment by observer August 12, 2007 @ 11:36 PMI just think it’s kind of pathetic, that as a resource, Fracas has posted some information that parents might not know, and some asshat comes along acting like she’s trying to enact friggin’ legislation and get the drug banned and is telling everyone what to do…
I swear, it seems like about two people might’ve actually “read” the post. I’m clearly not a fence-sitter when it comes to people being self-absorbed, illiterate ‘tards. I mean, I make “Asshat of the Day” posts for a reason. ;-)
In New Zealand a few years ago, stupid kids were dying nearly every day from huffing Raid — yeah, the bug spray. If her post had been about that, there would’ve been no argument…
Comment by Mark Steel August 13, 2007 @ 1:09 AMOh, by the way, Observer … I’m still laughing at you, just like I was laughing at every single one I commented on before. Maybe you should go back and read my responses with that in mind. ;-)
Comment by Mark Steel August 13, 2007 @ 1:15 AMLaugh and the world laughs with you Mark. Well, at least I will that’s for sure.
Like at dibble, who refers to “our teens” yet posts like a teen; who seems to think the United Nations is the be all and end all of good decisions; who refers to things being legal = being okay. Last I checked, it was legal to eat your own feces. Maybe dibble should try that too, before telling me to do a little more research when darn near all the facts I posted were from a pro-drug site.
LOL
Or like at observer – who posts “The real tragedy of this society isn’t the handful of kids who’ve got their heads ruined on Salvia. It’s the way our culture has made altered states of consciousness [snip] either taboo, dangerous and suspect….” I wonder if the parent of one of those “handful” of kids wouldn’t want to dispute what the real tragedy is.
Some of these replies are just so stupid you have to laugh.
Personally, I laugh at the fact that no matter what they come and post, they can’t just give me what I asked for…
I’ll reiterate it since I’m sure most of these people aren’t actually reading the post or the replies for comprehension. They just see the post, figure out it’s not pro-drug and post knee-jerk crap in reply. The challenge was:
Please justify the use of Salvia by providing absolute proof that Salvia use will never trigger mental illness of any kind that could ruin a person’s life.
If you can’t do that, then know that your responses are going to be laughed at and will really only serve to teach others how Salvia use probably causes stupidity as well as potential psychological problems.
Oh, and hi again Mark. Fancy meeting here!
Comment by fracas August 13, 2007 @ 2:03 AMWow, that\’s a real eye-opening article! I\’ll have to look into this further.
I\’m surprised that this isn\’t all over the news media. Considering the continuous drunk driving headlines when someone gets killed, this \”salvia\” just isn\’t making the news at this point. I would think that even any resulting psychotic episodes should be making the news. After all, antidepressants were publicized as one of the contributing factors in Columbine.
Unfortunately, the \”challenge\” you put forth so clearly at the end here isn\’t met by several legal substances, including alcohol, prescription antidepressants, and even aspartame.
Some of your other posters raise some valid points, however skewed by their experiences with this \”substance\”. History has proven that banning a substance outright isn\’t necessarily the answer, and tends to create an illegal underground network. Making it difficult for our kids to GET, on the other hand, and having stiff penalties for supplying it to minors, would be more in keeping with supporting human rights (adult choices), while protecting our kids.
Although I don\’t advocate the use of recreational drugs, there appears to be a very hazy line to be drawn here with comparisons to alcohol, which has very obvious and common negative effects (from unwanted pregnancies to criminally negligent vehicular manslaughter, or some would say \”murder\”).
I think that the first responsible step would be to reduce its availability to minors. Without further information, I\’d be leery of categorizing this as anything different from alcohol when it comes to free adult choices. IF in fact, this is NOT an addictive substance, and it\’s made unavailable to minors, I don\’t see how it could do as much damage in society as alcohol does.
Thanks for the heads-up!
Gary Wilson
Comment by G. Wilson September 7, 2007 @ 1:15 PMso what…. your saying that salvia divinorum is dangerous…HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH wow your funny, and now what, your gonna send videos and say complete bullshit on salvia almost like weed started to get illegal, u think weed is bad, pfft fuck no, its the goverment that bullshits u inot beliveing that , weed is bad, lmao, like look at the first movie that they made about weed “Reefer madness” haha u seriously believe that bullshit “your first joint will make u go crazy and jump off a cliff cuz u think u can fly” i mean seriously, if u thought u can fly, why not fly from where standing HAHA u wouldnt jump off a fucking cliff for god sakes, now think again before saying salvia is bad , fuck if it was that BAD, it wouldnt be legal now would it, deaths for weed and salvia …. 0, deaths for alchool and tobbaco……….. infinite and it will never stop.
Comment by jhon September 24, 2007 @ 10:47 AMu tell me what should be done first
Comment by jhon September 24, 2007 @ 10:49 AMLol i love how your going on about salvia and driving first of all nio ones gonna do salvia in an ally or without being surrounded by good freinds. explain to me how someone is going to manage to get into a car on salvia A)it needs to be smoked in a bong or pie
Comment by Reegan January 27, 2008 @ 11:04 PMB) your basiclly immobilized
C)driving is the last thing anyone would think off when your falling inside your own body surrounded by lego faces…try it then bash it. it would help your argument
I would comment, but the last several comments show how those who support drug use serve my advocacy against drug use simply by coming here and opening their mouths.
But, um.. to Reegan. There’s a video right in the post that shows some folks in a car using Salvia. Perhaps you missed that part while you were seeing the little lego faces?
Rotflmao.
Comment by fracas January 27, 2008 @ 11:22 PMYou Americans just can’t but help show your stupidity.
Hmm. You’re a little too vague, and since you neither posted a link to a site, and your email address was also fake, it’s not likely we’ll ever know if you were referring to me (since my comment was last) or the vast array of people who have arrived at this post and stopped long enough to post stupidity. I’m not sure how you know they’re all American though. I for one, know that I’m not an American. Don’t you think that to show up and without knowing whether the people you think are stupid are actually Americans or not, to label them such is a little… shall we say… stupid? Ironic, eh? – Fracas
Comment by christian right February 13, 2008 @ 8:31 PMIf u guys want to talk about dumb things people do to get high,u should type jenkem on your google search bar,or winnie
Thanks for the tip. While jenkem (or otherwise known as jekem, winnie, butthash, poop gas, etc.) is something real, there haven’t been reports of its widespread use here. You may check out the information at snopes.com for more. I will agree though, it ranks right up there with other dumb things to do. No question about that! – Fracas
Comment by fer May 1, 2008 @ 4:23 PMbe sure to check sites like salviamap.com to see if salvia divinorum is legal or not before you purchase it!
[Sorry evan, but my posts aren't exactly pro-salvia, so perhaps you should check out the links you find before just leaving a link to your commercial site... if I wasn't such a nice person, I'd redirect people to something nasty in your name as your reward for being such a dufus. -fracas]
Comment by evan May 4, 2009 @ 12:32 PM